219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15854326)
21. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes.
Kuroda S; Yamada K; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19268827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Unusual extraction treatment in Class II division 1 using C-orthodontic mini-implants.
Chung KR; Cho JH; Kim SH; Kook YA; Cozzani M
Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 17029536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Camouflage treatment of severe bialveolar protrusion in skeletal Class II using miniscrew anchorage.
Suzuki SS; Previdente LH; Garcez AS; Suzuki H
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23729140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants.
Papadopoulos MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):604.e1-16; discussion 604-5. PubMed ID: 18984391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the loading behavior of self-drilling and predrilled miniscrews throughout orthodontic loading.
Wang YC; Liou EJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18174069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
Monga N; Kharbanda OP; Samrit V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 27476360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new protocol of Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage.
Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 16849080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage.
Gracco A; Luca L; Siciliani G
Aust Orthod J; 2007 Nov; 23(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 18200793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Cephalometric analysis of implant anchorage-assisted retraction of anterior teeth].
Xu YL; Fang B; Mao LX; Feng YM; Xia YH; Lou XT; Wu Y
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Feb; 17(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18360662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Distalization of the entire maxillary arch in an adult.
Kyung SH; Lee JY; Shin JW; Hong C; Dietz V; Gianelly AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S123-32. PubMed ID: 19362263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Treatment of bimaxillary protrusion with temporary anchorage devices.
Mukaida K; Mayahara K; Sanuki-Suzuki R; Tamura T; Shimizu N
J Oral Sci; 2018; 60(2):316-319. PubMed ID: 29925716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of palatal miniscrew anchorage and lingual multi-bracket appliances to enhance efficiency of molar scissors-bite correction.
Tamamura N; Kuroda S; Sugawara Y; Takano-Yamamoto T; Yamashiro T
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 19413381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
Moon CH; Park HK; Nam JS; Im JS; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20620833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
Morarend C; Qian F; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Grosland NM; Morgan TA; McManus M; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 19651352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Temporary orthodontic anchorage devices for improving occlusion.
Rossouw PE; Buschang PH
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Aug; 12(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 19627521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
