These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Modality-independent processes in cued motor preparation revealed by cortical potentials. Diaconescu AO; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 18625564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study. Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention. Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaural timing cues do not contribute to the map of space in the ferret superior colliculus: a virtual acoustic space study. Campbell RA; Doubell TP; Nodal FR; Schnupp JW; King AJ J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):242-54. PubMed ID: 16162823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive load of navigating without vision when guided by virtual sound versus spatial language. Klatzky RL; Marston JR; Giudice NA; Golledge RG; Loomis JM J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17154771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete. Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory. Chai XJ; Jacobs LF Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 19963014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The electrophysiological correlate of saliency: evidence from a figure-detection task. Straube S; Fahle M Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():89-102. PubMed ID: 19854163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced self-localization by auditory cues in blind humans. Després O; Boudard D; Candas V; Dufour A Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jul; 27(13):753-9. PubMed ID: 16096227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization. Mayer AR; Kosson DS Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect. Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention? Mazza V; Turatto M; Rossi M; Umiltà C Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):514-22. PubMed ID: 16581094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task. Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]