265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15854714)
1. Microbiological risk assessment models for partitioning and mixing during food handling.
Nauta MJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 100(1-3):311-22. PubMed ID: 15854714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving quantitative exposure assessment by considering genetic diversity of B. cereus in cooked, pasteurised and chilled foods.
Afchain AL; Carlin F; Nguyen-The C; Albert I
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 128(1):165-73. PubMed ID: 18805600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A risk microbiological profile of the Australian red meat industry: risk ratings of hazard-product pairings.
Sumner J; Ross T; Jenson I; Pointon A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 105(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 16099063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative risk assessment of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. and cross-contamination during handling of raw broiler chickens evaluating strategies at the producer level to reduce human campylobacteriosis in Sweden.
Lindqvist R; Lindblad M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 121(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 18037525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A poultry-processing model for quantitative microbiological risk assessment.
Nauta M; van der Fels-Klerx I; Havelaar A
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 15787759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fine-tuning Food Safety Objectives and risk assessment.
Havelaar AH; Nauta MJ; Jansen JT
Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 May; 93(1):11-29. PubMed ID: 15135579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of risk assessments on Campylobacter in broiler meat.
Nauta M; Hill A; Rosenquist H; Brynestad S; Fetsch A; van der Logt P; Fazil A; Christensen B; Katsma E; Borck B; Havelaar A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):107-23. PubMed ID: 19136176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling bacterial growth in quantitative microbiological risk assessment: is it possible?
Nauta MJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2002 Mar; 73(2-3):297-304. PubMed ID: 11934037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Processing practices contributing to Campylobacter contamination in Belgian chicken meat preparations.
Sampers I; Habib I; Berkvens D; Dumoulin A; Zutter LD; Uyttendaele M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 128(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 18947895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative risk assessment of Campylobacter spp. in poultry based meat preparations as one of the factors to support the development of risk-based microbiological criteria in Belgium.
Uyttendaele M; Baert K; Ghafir Y; Daube G; De Zutter L; Herman L; Dierick K; Pierard D; Dubois JJ; Horion B; Debevere J
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 111(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 16876277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a transmission model to estimate performance objectives for Salmonella in the broiler supply chain.
van der Fels-Klerx HJ; Tromp S; Rijgersberg H; van Asselt ED
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 128(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18694611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.
Gill CO; Moza LF; Badoni M; Barbut S
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 16793158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of predictive modelling techniques in industry: from food design up to risk assessment.
Membré JM; Lambert RJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 128(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18701182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for inherent variability of growth in microbial risk assessment.
Marks HM; Coleman ME
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 100(1-3):275-87. PubMed ID: 15854712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Salmonella contamination of turkey from processing to final product--a process to product perspective.
Logue CM; Nde CW
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2007; 4(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 18041959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Studying the effects of POs and MCs on the Salmonella ALOP with a quantitative risk assessment model for beef production.
Tuominen P; Ranta J; Maijala R
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 118(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 17658191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Predictive microbiology and risk assessment].
Hildebrandt G; Kleer J
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 May; 111(5):195-200. PubMed ID: 15233338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the "testing and scheduling" strategy for control of Campylobacter in broiler meat in The Netherlands.
Nauta MJ; van der Wal FJ; Putirulan FF; Post J; van de Kassteele J; Bolder NM
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 134(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 19674803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling transfer of Listeria monocytogenes from slicer to deli meat during mechanical slicing.
Sheen S; Hwang CA
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2008 Apr; 5(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 18361687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
