These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15854714)

  • 41. Stochastic, compartmental, and dynamic modeling of cross-contamination during mechanical smearing of cheeses.
    Aziza F; Mettler E; Daudin JJ; Sanaa M
    Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):731-45. PubMed ID: 16834630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quantitative modeling for risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in bloody clams in southern Thailand.
    Yamamoto A; Iwahori J; Vuddhakul V; Charernjiratragul W; Vose D; Osaka K; Shigematsu M; Toyofuku H; Yamamoto S; Nishibuchi M; Kasuga F
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 May; 124(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 18405992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
    Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A risk assessment approach applied to the growth of Erwinia carotovora in vegetable juice for variable temperature conditions.
    Shorten PR; Soboleva TK; Pleasants AB; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 May; 109(1-2):60-70. PubMed ID: 16507324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Modeling the frequency and duration of microbial contamination events.
    Powell MR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 16690153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interactive software for estimating the efficacy of non-isothermal heat preservation processes.
    Peleg M; Normand MD; Corradini MG
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 126(1-2):250-7. PubMed ID: 18571264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Campylobacter spp. contamination of chicken carcasses during processing in relation to flock colonisation.
    Allen VM; Bull SA; Corry JE; Domingue G; Jørgensen F; Frost JA; Whyte R; Gonzalez A; Elviss N; Humphrey TJ
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 113(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 17007949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Qualitative exposure assessment for Salmonella spp. in shell eggs produced on the island of Ireland.
    Murchie L; Xia B; Madden RH; Whyte P; Kelly L
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 125(3):308-19. PubMed ID: 18556082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Indicators of emerging hazards and risks to food safety.
    Kleter GA; Marvin HJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 May; 47(5):1022-39. PubMed ID: 18761390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Recontamination as a source of pathogens in processed foods.
    Reij MW; Den Aantrekker ED;
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Feb; 91(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 14967555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of three modelling approaches for quantitative risk assessment using the case study of Salmonella spp. in poultry meat.
    Parsons DJ; Orton TG; D'Souza J; Moore A; Jones R; Dodd CE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Jan; 98(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 15617799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A novel method for assessing the role of air in the microbiological contamination of poultry carcasses.
    Burfoot D; Whyte RT; Tinker DB; Hall K; Allen VM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 115(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 17126440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A field study of the microbiological quality of fresh produce of domestic and Mexican origin.
    Johnston LM; Jaykus LA; Moll D; Anciso J; Mora B; Moe CL
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Nov; 112(2):83-95. PubMed ID: 17045687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A structured expert judgment study for a model of Campylobacter transmission during broiler-chicken processing.
    Van der Fels-Klerx HJ; Cooke RM; Nauta MN; Goossens LH; Havelaar AH
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):109-24. PubMed ID: 15787761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Food safety objectives should integrate the variability of the concentration of pathogen.
    Rieu E; Duhem K; Vindel E; Sanaa M
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):373-86. PubMed ID: 17511704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Risk assessment of biological hazards in the European Union.
    Hugas M; Tsigarida E; Robinson T; Calistri P
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 120(1-2):131-5. PubMed ID: 17659800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Food reformulations for improved health: A potential risk for microbial food safety?
    Sleator RD; Hill C
    Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(6):1323-4. PubMed ID: 17452083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation and control of the risk of foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria present in Awa-Uirou, a sticky rice cake containing sweet red bean paste.
    Okahisa N; Inatsu Y; Juneja VK; Kawamoto S
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2008 Jun; 5(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 18564913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Microbial ecology of food contact surfaces and products of small-scale facilities producing traditional sausages.
    Gounadaki AS; Skandamis PN; Drosinos EH; Nychas GJ
    Food Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 25(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 18206774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Predicted quantitative effect of logistic slaughter on microbial prevalence.
    Evers EG
    Prev Vet Med; 2004 Aug; 65(1-2):31-46. PubMed ID: 15454325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.