These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15854762)

  • 1. The elicitation of phonological and semantic neuromagnetic field components by non-words in human auditory sentence comprehension.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ferrari P; Roberts TP
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):116-21. PubMed ID: 15854762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical competition in nonnative speech comprehension.
    FitzPatrick I; Indefrey P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1165-78. PubMed ID: 19583470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human auditory evoked mismatch field amplitudes vary as a function of vowel duration in healthy first-language speakers.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ohta K; Shirahama Y; Takashima A; Horiguchi T; Matsushima E
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 15288448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromagnetic mismatch field (MMF) dependence on the auditory temporal integration window and the existence of categorical boundaries: comparisons between dissyllabic words and their equivalent tones.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ohta K; Matsushima E; Ferrari P; Scovel T
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1232():155-62. PubMed ID: 18671951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension.
    Koester D; Holle H; Gunter TC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1854-64. PubMed ID: 19428417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetoencephalography evidence of semantic violations in auditory sentence comprehension by native speakers of Japanese.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Roberts TP
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Oct; 331(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 12361858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mouse with a roof? effects of phonological neighbors on processing of words in sentences in a non-native language.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Nojack A; Limbach M
    Brain Lang; 2008 Feb; 104(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 17391746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex.
    Bonte M; Parviainen T; Hytönen K; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jan; 16(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 15829731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch accent and lexical tone processing in Chinese discourse comprehension: an ERP study.
    Li X; Yang Y; Hagoort P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():192-200. PubMed ID: 18585687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels.
    Obleser J; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 15006034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonotactic knowledge and lexical-semantic processing in one-year-olds: brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts.
    Friedrich M; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1785-802. PubMed ID: 16269114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing.
    Tavabi K; Obleser J; Dobel C; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3155-62. PubMed ID: 17561829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Musicians and the metric structure of words.
    Marie C; Magne C; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):294-305. PubMed ID: 20044890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing.
    Davidson DJ; Indefrey P
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1158():81-92. PubMed ID: 17560965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An event-related brain potential study of sentence comprehension in preschoolers: semantic and morphosyntactic processing.
    Silva-Pereyra J; Rivera-Gaxiola M; Kuhl PK
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):247-58. PubMed ID: 15820632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates of word comprehension: event-related potential (ERP) and independent component analysis (ICA).
    Mehta J; Jerger S; Jerger J; Martin J
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19173108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An event-related potential investigation of lexical pitch-accent processing in auditory Japanese.
    Koso A; Ojima S; Hagiwara H
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1385():217-28. PubMed ID: 21316355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.