BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15854762)

  • 1. The elicitation of phonological and semantic neuromagnetic field components by non-words in human auditory sentence comprehension.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ferrari P; Roberts TP
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):116-21. PubMed ID: 15854762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical competition in nonnative speech comprehension.
    FitzPatrick I; Indefrey P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1165-78. PubMed ID: 19583470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human auditory evoked mismatch field amplitudes vary as a function of vowel duration in healthy first-language speakers.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ohta K; Shirahama Y; Takashima A; Horiguchi T; Matsushima E
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 15288448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromagnetic mismatch field (MMF) dependence on the auditory temporal integration window and the existence of categorical boundaries: comparisons between dissyllabic words and their equivalent tones.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ohta K; Matsushima E; Ferrari P; Scovel T
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1232():155-62. PubMed ID: 18671951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension.
    Koester D; Holle H; Gunter TC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1854-64. PubMed ID: 19428417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetoencephalography evidence of semantic violations in auditory sentence comprehension by native speakers of Japanese.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Roberts TP
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Oct; 331(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 12361858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mouse with a roof? effects of phonological neighbors on processing of words in sentences in a non-native language.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Nojack A; Limbach M
    Brain Lang; 2008 Feb; 104(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 17391746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex.
    Bonte M; Parviainen T; Hytönen K; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jan; 16(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 15829731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch accent and lexical tone processing in Chinese discourse comprehension: an ERP study.
    Li X; Yang Y; Hagoort P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():192-200. PubMed ID: 18585687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels.
    Obleser J; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 15006034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonotactic knowledge and lexical-semantic processing in one-year-olds: brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts.
    Friedrich M; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1785-802. PubMed ID: 16269114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing.
    Tavabi K; Obleser J; Dobel C; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3155-62. PubMed ID: 17561829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Musicians and the metric structure of words.
    Marie C; Magne C; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):294-305. PubMed ID: 20044890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing.
    Davidson DJ; Indefrey P
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1158():81-92. PubMed ID: 17560965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An event-related brain potential study of sentence comprehension in preschoolers: semantic and morphosyntactic processing.
    Silva-Pereyra J; Rivera-Gaxiola M; Kuhl PK
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):247-58. PubMed ID: 15820632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates of word comprehension: event-related potential (ERP) and independent component analysis (ICA).
    Mehta J; Jerger S; Jerger J; Martin J
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19173108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An event-related potential investigation of lexical pitch-accent processing in auditory Japanese.
    Koso A; Ojima S; Hagiwara H
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1385():217-28. PubMed ID: 21316355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.