189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15855106)
1. Screening mammography reduces morbidity of breast cancer treatment.
Leung JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1508-9. PubMed ID: 15855106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy.
Barth RJ; Gibson GR; Carney PA; Mott LA; Becher RD; Poplack SP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):324-9. PubMed ID: 15615996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma.
Herrada J; Iyer RB; Atkinson EN; Sneige N; Buzdar AU; Hortobagyi GN
Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Sep; 3(9):1565-9. PubMed ID: 9815844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of breast cancers diagnosed in screening patients in their 40s with and without family history of breast cancer in a community outpatient facility.
Destounis SV; Arieno AL; Morgan RC; Cavanaugh D; Seifert PJ; Murphy PF; Somerville PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):928-32. PubMed ID: 24660726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population.
Schmitt EL; Threatt B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic factors of breast neoplasms detected on screening by mammography and physical examination.
Feig SA; Schwartz GF; Nerlinger R; Edeiken J
Radiology; 1979 Dec; 133(3 Pt 1):577-82. PubMed ID: 504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the effectiveness of a mammography screening service.
Clayforth C; Fritschi L; McEvoy S; Byrne MJ; Wylie E; Threlfall T; Sterrett G; Harvey JM; Jamrozik K
ANZ J Surg; 2005 Aug; 75(8):631-6. PubMed ID: 16076321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New era in breast cancer. Impact of screening on disease presentation.
Cady B
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 9103207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer.
Hicks MJ; Davis JR; Layton JM; Present AJ
JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(19):2080-3. PubMed ID: 490787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of mammographic screening relative to the treatment of women with carcinoma of the breast.
Solin LJ; Legorreta A; Schultz DJ; Zatz S; Goodman RL
Arch Intern Med; 1994 Apr; 154(7):745-52. PubMed ID: 8147678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long follow-up of breast cancer revealed by clustered microcalcifications without palpable mass].
Wehbe G; Sepanda M; Nos C; Falcou MC; Meunier M; Zafrani B; Fourquet A; Durand JC; Azoury J; Massoud E; Bentley Clough K
J Med Liban; 2004; 52(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 15881694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance.
Frankel SD; Sickles EA; Curpen BN; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1107-9. PubMed ID: 7717214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recurrence-free survival in patients with small breast cancer. An analysis of cancers 10 mm or less detected clinically and by screening.
Arnesson LG; Smeds S; Fagerberg G
Eur J Surg; 1994 May; 160(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 8075195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.
Shen Y; Yang Y; Inoue LY; Munsell MF; Miller AB; Berry DA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Aug; 97(16):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16106024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
