103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15855133)
1. Sonographically guided biopsy of focal lesions: a comparison of freehand and probe-guided techniques using a phantom.
Phal PM; Brooks DM; Wolfe R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1652-6. PubMed ID: 15855133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparison of freehand and electromagnetic needle tracking for US-guided percutaneous liver biopsy.
Hakime A; Barah A; Deschamps F; Farouil G; Joskin J; Tselikas L; Auperin A; de Baere T
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1682-9. PubMed ID: 23891047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Freehand versus guided breast biopsy: comparison of accuracy, needle motion, and biopsy time in a tissue model.
Bluvol N; Kornecki A; Shaikh A; Del Rey Fernandez D; Taves DH; Fenster A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1720-5. PubMed ID: 19457840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of sonographic and CT guidance techniques: does CT fluoroscopy decrease procedure time?
Sheafor DH; Paulson EK; Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):939-42. PubMed ID: 10749226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a breast biopsy phantom for learning freehand ultrasound-guided biopsy of the liver.
Nicotra JJ; Gay SB; Wallace KK; McNulty BC; Dameron RD
Acad Radiol; 1994 Dec; 1(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 9419516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of sonographically guided biopsy using a freehand versus needle-guided technique: computed tomographic correlation study.
Shabana W; Kielar A; Vermani V; Fernandes DD; Antoniscu R; Schweitzer M
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Mar; 32(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 23443195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of CT biopsy: laser guidance versus conventional freehand techniques.
Pereles FS; Baker M; Baldwin R; Krupinski E; Unger EC
Acad Radiol; 1998 Nov; 5(11):766-70. PubMed ID: 9809074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Freehand biopsy guided by electromagnetic needle tracking: a phantom study.
Ewertsen C; Nielsen KR; Nielsen MB
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32(6):614-8. PubMed ID: 22144128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a turkey-breast phantom for teaching freehand, US-guided core-needle breast biopsy.
Harvey JA; Moran RE; Hamer MM; DeAngelis GA; Omary RA
Acad Radiol; 1997 Aug; 4(8):565-9. PubMed ID: 9261455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A phantom study comparing ultrasound-guided liver tumor puncture using new real-time 3D ultrasound and conventional 2D ultrasound.
Sugimoto K; Moriyasu F; Shiraishi J; Yamada M; Imai Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W753-7. PubMed ID: 21606264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of four-dimensional ultrasonography in ultrasonographically guided biopsy of hepatic masses.
Won HJ; Han JK; Do KH; Lee KH; Kim KW; Kim SH; Yoon CJ; Kim YJ; Park CM; Choi BI
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Feb; 22(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 12562126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel Laser Navigation System reduces radiation exposure and improves accuracy and workflow of CT-guided spinal interventions: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial in comparison to conventional freehand puncture.
Moser C; Becker J; Deli M; Busch M; Boehme M; Groenemeyer DH
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 23265179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biopsy guided by real-time sonography fused with MRI: a phantom study.
Ewertsen C; Grossjohann HS; Nielsen KR; Torp-Pedersen S; Nielsen MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1671-4. PubMed ID: 18492923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Florence-Sydney Breast Biopsy Study: sensitivity of ultrasound-guided versus freehand fine needle biopsy of palpable breast cancer.
Houssami N; Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Catarzi S; Risso G; Bonardi R; Irwig L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Jan; 89(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 15666197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A needle guidance device compared to free hand technique in an ultrasound-guided interventional task using a phantom.
van Geffen GJ; Mulder J; Gielen M; van Egmond J; Scheffer GJ; Bruhn J
Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):986-90. PubMed ID: 18540929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electromagnetic-tracked biopsy under ultrasound guidance: preliminary results.
Hakime A; Deschamps F; De Carvalho EG; Barah A; Auperin A; De Baere T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Aug; 35(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 21947580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of focal lesions using three-dimensional ultrasound with a matrix array transducer: comparison with 2-dimensional ultrasound in a phantom study.
Kim HC; Yang DM; Nam DH; Kim KW
Invest Radiol; 2011 Apr; 46(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 21368588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser assisted ultrasound guided aspiration improves procedure time and reduces number of withdrawals.
Liu SY; Liao MY; Wei TS; Yang CP; Chen LW; Lin SJ; Ding YS; Chang YJ
Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 18433822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of a new ultrasound-guided biopsy device: Improved ergonomics, sampling and rebiopsy rates.
Duchesne N; Parker SH; Lechner MC; Gittleman MA; Kusnick CA; Elvecrog EE; Kaske TI; Gizienski TA
Breast J; 2007; 13(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 17214791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
