These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15855874)

  • 1. [Simple method of setting proper exposure in X-ray CT examination of head and abdomen].
    Kondo Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Apr; 61(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 15855874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) on image quality and radiation dose at abdominal computed tomography (CT): A phantom study.
    Wang Q; Zhao X; Song J; Guo N; Zhu Y; Liu J; Qi W; Wu J; Liang Y; Feng S; Hu M; Zhou C; Wang X; Hong N
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(4):453-64. PubMed ID: 24191984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom.
    Castellano IA; Dance DR; Evans PM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):321-5. PubMed ID: 15933130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
    Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient dose reduction in CT examinations by optimising scanogram acquisition.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Voloudaki A; Papadakis A; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 93(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 11548341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Toth TL; Nguyen GT; Toncheva GI; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi TT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):W100-5. PubMed ID: 18212190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated pediatric abdominal effective diameter measurements versus age-predicted body size for normalization of CT dose.
    Cheng PM; Vachon LA; Duddalwar VA
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Dec; 26(6):1151-5. PubMed ID: 23836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prefecture-wide multi-centre radiation dose survey as a useful tool for CT dose optimisation: report of Gunma radiation dose study.
    Fukushima Y; Taketomi-Takahashi A; Nakajima T; Tsushima Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 25344887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrepancy between absorbed dose estimated from phantom measurements and from estimates using data on individual head sizes in head CT examinations.
    Adliene D; Mockeviciene S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):186-90. PubMed ID: 20167791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation exposure during paediatric CT in Sudan: CT dose, organ and effective doses.
    Suliman II; Khamis HM; Ombada TH; Alzimami K; Alkhorayef M; Sulieman A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 25377750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A radiation exposure index for CT.
    Huda W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 23690648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
    Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of AAPM Reports 204 and 220: Estimation of effective diameter, water-equivalent diameter, and ellipticity ratios for chest, abdomen, pelvis, and head CT scans.
    Burton CS; Szczykutowicz TP
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):228-238. PubMed ID: 29178549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index.
    Nickoloff EL; Dutta AK; Lu ZF
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12674240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phantom studies for possible dose reduction in CT head procedures.
    Staniszewska MA; Obrzut M; Rybka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):326-31. PubMed ID: 15933131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
    Kataria B; Sandborg M; Althén JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):130-5. PubMed ID: 26743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Dose-Length Product-Based and Monte Carlo Simulation Organ-Based Calculations of Effective Dose in 16- and 64-MDCT Examinations Using Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
    Haji-Momenian S; Ellenbogen A; Khati N; Taffel M; Earls J; Miller G; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):583-592. PubMed ID: 29381379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation exposure in multidetector CT: dose comparison between late 1990s and early 2010s in Korea.
    Kim MC; Han DK; Kim YM; Lim CH; Yeon KJ; Yoon J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Oct; 156(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 23567199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.