BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15855922)

  • 1. Evaluation of prognostic significance in extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.
    Nakamura K; Ozaki N; Yamada T; Hata T; Sugimoto S; Hikino H; Kanazawa A; Tokuka A; Nagaoka S
    Surgery; 2005 May; 137(5):511-7. PubMed ID: 15855922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracapsular lymph node spread: a new prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
    Alakus H; Hölscher AH; Grass G; Hartmann E; Schulte C; Drebber U; Baldus SE; Bollschweiler E; Metzger R; Mönig SP
    Cancer; 2010 Jan; 116(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 19950124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic significance of level and number of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer.
    Saito H; Fukumoto Y; Osaki T; Fukuda K; Tatebe S; Tsujitani S; Ikeguchi M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17245613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
    Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extracapsular spread of nodal metastasis as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer.
    Heide J; Krüll A; Berger J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(3):773-8. PubMed ID: 14967433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node size in patients with gastric cancer.
    Dhar DK; Kubota H; Kinukawa N; Maruyama R; Kyriazanos ID; Ohno S; Nagasue N
    Br J Surg; 2003 Dec; 90(12):1522-30. PubMed ID: 14648731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic significance of the ratio between metastatic and dissected lymph nodes (n ratio) in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
    Saito H; Fukumoto Y; Osaki T; Yamada Y; Fukuda K; Tatebe S; Tsujitani S; Ikeguchi M
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 17979134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T3 gastric cancer.
    Hyung WJ; Noh SH; Yoo CH; Huh JH; Shin DW; Lah KH; Lee JH; Choi SH; Min JS
    World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 11865369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].
    Pan Y; Liang H; Xue Q; Zhang RP; Cui QH; Liu N; Wang BG
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 May; 30(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 18953840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
    Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
    Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China.
    Deng J; Liang H; Sun D; Wang D; Pan Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 May; 17(5):1259-66. PubMed ID: 20217252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.
    Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after d2 resection regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
    Xu DZ; Geng QR; Long ZJ; Zhan YQ; Li W; Zhou ZW; Chen YB; Sun XW; Chen G; Liu Q
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 19050970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impact of extracapsular lymph node spread in the ipsilateral neck on contralateral neck metastasis and prognosis of laryngeal cancer].
    Liu B; Guan C; Ji WY; Pan ZM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 28(11):871-5. PubMed ID: 17416015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic significance of morphological distribution of metastatic foci in lymph nodes with gastric cancer.
    Nakamura K; Nabeshima K; Makuuchi H; Ogoshi K
    Dig Surg; 2011; 28(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 21921632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perigastric lymph node status can be a simple prognostic parameter in patients with gastric cancer.
    Kim TH; Han SU; Cho YK; Kim MW
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(35):1475-8. PubMed ID: 11100380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metastatic lymph node size and colorectal cancer prognosis.
    Dhar DK; Yoshimura H; Kinukawa N; Maruyama R; Tachibana M; Kohno H; Kubota H; Nagasue N
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jan; 200(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 15631916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
    Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
    Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
    Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.