BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15856394)

  • 1. [Complications of central venous access devices: outcome analysis of 2359 implantations].
    Stein M; Wagner RH
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 May; 130(18):1129-32. PubMed ID: 15856394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgically implanted subcutaneous venous access devices in cancer patients.
    Repelaer van Driel OJ; Kuin CM; van de Velde CJ
    Neth J Surg; 1988 Jun; 40(4):97-9. PubMed ID: 3217033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cephalic vein access for implantable venous access devices. Technique and long-term follow-up].
    Conessa C; Talfer S; Herve S; Chollet O; Poncet JL
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 12577777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility and complications of permanent venous access devices (PVAD) in oncological treatments. Follow-up of 100 cases.
    Groebli Y; Wutrich P; Safa M; Tschantz P; Callewaert G; Piguet D
    Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 10479903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Central venous access systems in the oncologic patient].
    Ragusa M; Alberti D; Argento R; Avenia N; Bartolucci R; Esposito S; Ferilli F; Marini C
    Minerva Chir; 2000 Mar; 55(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 10832298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Totally implantable central venous access devices in adult oncological patients.
    Florio G; Del Papa M; Mari A; Carnì D
    Chir Ital; 2008; 60(5):697-702. PubMed ID: 19062492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of end-stage central venous access in children referred for possible small bowel transplantation.
    Rodrigues AF; van Mourik ID; Sharif K; Barron DJ; de Giovanni JV; Bennett J; Bromley P; Protheroe S; John P; de Ville de Goyet J; Beath SV
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2006 Apr; 42(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 16641582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Implantable devices for central venous access in cancer patients. Our experience in 217 cases].
    Torramadé J; Hernández JL; Cienfuegos JA; Albiach M; Pardo F; Benito C; González J; Voltas J
    Med Clin (Barc); 1992 May; 98(19):731-3. PubMed ID: 1608278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Totally implantable femoral vein catheters in cancer patients.
    Wolosker N; Yazbek G; Munia MA; Zerati AE; Langer M; Nishinari K
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Sep; 30(7):771-5. PubMed ID: 15296992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
    Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Complications of central venous and indwelling catheterization].
    Douard MC; Desruennes E; Kriegel I; Blot F
    Rev Prat; 2006 Jun; 56(12):1281-9. PubMed ID: 16948214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Emergency vascular access in patients with renal failure. Apropos of 32 implantations of permcath].
    Chatelard P; Trolliet P; Gilly F; Devolfe C; Caillot JL; Chazot C; François B; Bouchet A
    J Chir (Paris); 1990 Jan; 127(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 2312626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Port-A-Cath implantation using percutaneous puncture without guidance.
    Ku YH; Kuo PH; Tsai YF; Huang WT; Lin MH; Tsao CJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 19101767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polyurethane II catheter as long-indwelling intravenous catheter in patients with cancer.
    Volkow P; Vázquez C; Téllez O; Aguilar C; Barrera L; Rodrgíuez E; Vilar-Compte D; Zinser J; Calderón E; Pérez-Padilla JR; Mohar A
    Am J Infect Control; 2003 Nov; 31(7):392-6. PubMed ID: 14639434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
    Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Horie T; Furihata M; Nakagawa A; Kubota K
    Eur Surg Res; 2008; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A totally implantable venous access device. Implantation in general or local anaesthesia? A retrospective cost analysis].
    Schuld J; Richter S; Moussavian MR; Kollmar O; Schilling MK
    Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Aug; 134(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 19688683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
    Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fistulae or catheter for elderly who start hemodialysis without permanent vascular access?].
    García Cortés MJ; Viedma G; Sánchez Perales MC; Borrego FJ; Borrego J; Pérez del Barrio P; Gil Cunquero JM; Liébana A; Pérez Bañasco V
    Nefrologia; 2005; 25(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 16053012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Long-term central venous lines and their complications].
    Teichgräber UK; Gebauer B; Benter T; Wagner J
    Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):944-52. PubMed ID: 15237335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.