490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15856480)
1. Comparison of X-ray and NMR structures: is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X-ray- and NMR-resolved protein structures?
Garbuzynskiy SO; Melnik BS; Lobanov MY; Finkelstein AV; Galzitskaya OV
Proteins; 2005 Jul; 60(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 15856480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The difference between protein structures that are obtained by X-ray analysis and magnetic resonance spectroscopy].
Mel'nik BS; Garbuzinskiĭ SA; Lobanov MIu; Galzitskaia OV
Mol Biol (Mosk); 2005; 39(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 15773557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing.
Andrec M; Snyder DA; Zhou Z; Young J; Montelione GT; Levy RM
Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(3):449-65. PubMed ID: 17623851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Crystallographic and NMR spectroscopic protein structures: the inter-residue contacts].
Abaturov LV; Nosova NG
Mol Biol (Mosk); 2012; 46(2):317-34. PubMed ID: 22670528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative stability of protein structures determined by X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy: a molecular dynamics simulation study.
Fan H; Mark AE
Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 12945054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. pKa measurements from nuclear magnetic resonance for the B1 and B2 immunoglobulin G-binding domains of protein G: comparison with calculated values for nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray structures.
Khare D; Alexander P; Antosiewicz J; Bryan P; Gilson M; Orban J
Biochemistry; 1997 Mar; 36(12):3580-9. PubMed ID: 9132009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Search for allosteric disulfide bonds in NMR structures.
Schmidt B; Hogg PJ
BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Jul; 7():49. PubMed ID: 17640393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geometry, energetics, and dynamics of hydrogen bonds in proteins: structural information derived from NMR scalar couplings.
Gsponer J; Hopearuoho H; Cavalli A; Dobson CM; Vendruscolo M
J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Nov; 128(47):15127-35. PubMed ID: 17117864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures.
Lee SY; Zhang Y; Skolnick J
Proteins; 2006 May; 63(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 16456861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conformational variability of chicken cystatin. Comparison of structures determined by X-ray diffraction and NMR spectroscopy.
Engh RA; Dieckmann T; Bode W; Auerswald EA; Turk V; Huber R; Oschkinat H
J Mol Biol; 1993 Dec; 234(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 8263913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparison of X-ray diffraction analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance from the data on the identification of alpha-helices and beta-strands in the same proteins].
Shestopalov BV
Biofizika; 2005; 50(6):998-1001. PubMed ID: 16358777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation.
Grishaev A; Bax A
J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jun; 126(23):7281-92. PubMed ID: 15186165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human interleukin-4 and variant R88Q: phasing X-ray diffraction data by molecular replacement using X-ray and nuclear magnetic resonance models.
Müller T; Oehlenschläger F; Buehner M
J Mol Biol; 1995 Mar; 247(2):360-72. PubMed ID: 7707380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Catalytic mechanism of cyclophilin as observed in molecular dynamics simulations: pathway prediction and reconciliation of X-ray crystallographic and NMR solution data.
Trzesniak D; van Gunsteren WF
Protein Sci; 2006 Nov; 15(11):2544-51. PubMed ID: 17075133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons of NMR spectral quality and success in crystallization demonstrate that NMR and X-ray crystallography are complementary methods for small protein structure determination.
Snyder DA; Chen Y; Denissova NG; Acton T; Aramini JM; Ciano M; Karlin R; Liu J; Manor P; Rajan PA; Rossi P; Swapna GV; Xiao R; Rost B; Hunt J; Montelione GT
J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Nov; 127(47):16505-11. PubMed ID: 16305237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent developments in structural proteomics for protein structure determination.
Liu HL; Hsu JP
Proteomics; 2005 May; 5(8):2056-68. PubMed ID: 15846841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of protein disorder.
Dosztányi Z; Tompa P
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 426():103-15. PubMed ID: 18542859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Structure of crambin in solution, crystal and in the trajectories of molecular dynamics simulations].
Abaturov LV; Nosova NG
Biofizika; 2013; 58(3):425-44. PubMed ID: 24159811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
