These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15856683)
1. Foot volume estimates based on a geometric algorithm in comparison to water displacement. Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Litwin B; Pfister S Lymphology; 2005 Mar; 38(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15856683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hand volume estimates based on a geometric algorithm in comparison to water displacement. Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Hill CJ; Hernandez T; Greenshner A; Diep H Lymphology; 2006 Jun; 39(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 16910100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume. Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema. Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema. Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements. Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema. Mayrovitz HN; Macdonald J; Davey S; Olson K; Washington E Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 87(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 17684090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of limb volume: laser scanning versus volume displacement. McKinnon JG; Wong V; Temple WJ; Galbraith C; Ferry P; Clynch GS; Clynch C J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 96(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 17477361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema. Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and clinical evaluation of a computerized limb volume measurement system (CLEMS). Bednarczyk JH; Hershler C; Cooper DG Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 73(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 1729976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Localized tissue water changes accompanying one manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) therapy session assessed by changes in tissue dielectric constant inpatients with lower extremity lymphedema. Mayrovitz HN; Davey S; Shapiro E Lymphology; 2008 Jun; 41(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 18720916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The validity and reliability of the Perometer in evaluating human knee volume. Man IO; Markland KL; Morrissey MC Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Nov; 24(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 15522044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a foot-to-foot impedance meter measuring extracellular fluid volume in addition to fat-free mass and fat tissue mass. Jaffrin MY; Kieffer R; Moreno MV Nutrition; 2005; 21(7-8):815-24. PubMed ID: 15975489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining lower limb lymphedema after inguinal or ilio-inguinal dissection in patients with melanoma using classification and regression tree analysis. Spillane AJ; Saw RP; Tucker M; Byth K; Thompson JF Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18650640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery. Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple and innovative device to measure arm volume at home for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer. Lette J J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(34):5434-40. PubMed ID: 17135645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness of two methods for measuring foot and ankle volume. Henschke N; Boland RA; Adams RD Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Oct; 27(10):826-32. PubMed ID: 17054886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of different methods to quantify the volume of horse limbs]. Haase F; Siewert C; von Rautenfeld DB; Fischbach JU; Seifert H Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009; 122(3-4):126-31. PubMed ID: 19350812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of limb volume by manual and automated methods in patients with limb edema or lymphedema. Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Macdonald J Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(6):272-6. PubMed ID: 12669673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]