These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15857084)
1. Histologic evaluation of three methods of periodontal root surface treatment in humans. Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 15857084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces: a histologic study. Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 16460247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces. Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one? Drisko CH Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing. Hunter RK; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH J Periodontol; 1984 Dec; 55(12):697-703. PubMed ID: 6394737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of EDTA gel conditioning exposure time on periodontitis-affected human root surfaces: surface topography and PDL cell adhesion. Gamal AY; Mailhot JM J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Jan; 5(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 12666951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of a carbon dioxide laser on periodontally involved root surfaces. Misra V; Mehrotra KK; Dixit J; Maitra SC J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1046-52. PubMed ID: 10505808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Er:YAG laser in defocused mode for scaling of periodontally involved root surfaces: an in vitro pilot study. Crespi R; Romanos GE; Barone A; Sculean A; Covani U J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):686-90. PubMed ID: 15898927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical and chemical root preparation in vitro: efficiency of plaque and calculus removal. Eschler BM; Rapley JW J Periodontol; 1991 Dec; 62(12):755-60. PubMed ID: 1722511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo. Schwarz F; Bieling K; Venghaus S; Sculean A; Jepsen S; Becker J J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 16489946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits. Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature]. Deblauwe BM; van der Weijden GA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Jul; 99(7):239-44. PubMed ID: 11819997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study. Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study. Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four methods of assessing root surface debridement. Chan YK; Needleman IG; Clifford LR J Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 71(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 10776925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of subgingival calculus removal with Er:YAG laser compared to mechanical debridement: an in situ study. Eberhard J; Ehlers H; Falk W; Açil Y; Albers HK; Jepsen S J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 12795789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of CO2 laser treatment on fibroblast attachment to root surfaces. A scanning electron microscopy analysis. Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U; Ciaglia RN; Romanos GE J Periodontol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1308-12. PubMed ID: 12479635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth. Wylam JM; Mealey BL; Mills MP; Waldrop TC; Moskowicz DC J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8295086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]