786 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15857088)
21. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques.
Arisan V; Karabuda CZ; Ozdemir T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24993374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Calasso S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.
Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles.
Ochi M; Kanazawa M; Sato D; Kasugai S; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24209910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.
Bilhan H; Arat S; Mumcu E; Geckili O; Sakar O
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 21126171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of stereolithographic models as diagnostic and restorative aids for predictable immediate loading of implants.
Ganz SD
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):763-71; quiz 772. PubMed ID: 14969213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.
Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G
J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: a retrospective study.
Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Calasso S; Barbato E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):448-59. PubMed ID: 21745330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method.
Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1530-5. PubMed ID: 24954760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates--a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I).
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 19939692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report.
Stumpel LJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 20156227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure.
Fortin T; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
