753 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15858072)
1. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech.
Schembri A; Jones C; Burnham D
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 15858072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociating linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural communication in the brain.
MacSweeney M; Campbell R; Woll B; Giampietro V; David AS; McGuire PK; Calvert GA; Brammer MJ
Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1605-18. PubMed ID: 15275917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners.
Brentari D; González C; Seidl A; Wilbur R
Lang Speech; 2011 Mar; 54(Pt 1):49-72. PubMed ID: 21524012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-verbal IQ is correlated with visual field advantages for short duration coherent motion detection in deaf signers with varied ASL exposure and etiologies of deafness.
Samar VJ; Parasnis I
Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 17574715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.
Goldin-Meadow S; Mylander C
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1984; 49(3-4):1-151. PubMed ID: 6537463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural systems supporting linguistic structure, linguistic experience, and symbolic communication in sign language and gesture.
Newman AJ; Supalla T; Fernandez N; Newport EL; Bavelier D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(37):11684-9. PubMed ID: 26283352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motor-iconicity of sign language does not alter the neural systems underlying tool and action naming.
Emmorey K; Grabowski T; McCullough S; Damasio H; Ponto L; Hichwa R; Bellugi U
Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 15010234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neural organization for recognition of grammatical and emotional facial expressions in deaf ASL signers and hearing nonsigners.
McCullough S; Emmorey K; Sereno M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 15653293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aphasic and parkinsonian signing: differences in phonological disruption.
Brentari D; Poizner H; Kegl J
Brain Lang; 1995 Jan; 48(1):69-105. PubMed ID: 7712149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From gesture to sign language: conventionalization of classifier constructions by adult hearing learners of British Sign Language.
Marshall CR; Morgan G
Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jan; 7(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 25329326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Signed language and human action processing: evidence for functional constraints on the human mirror-neuron system.
Corina DP; Knapp HP
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Dec; 1145():100-12. PubMed ID: 19076392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First stage of language acquisition through two modalities in deaf and hearing children.
Volterra V; Caselli MC
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1986 Apr; Suppl 5():109-15. PubMed ID: 3759399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the effects of auditory deprivation and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex.
Fine I; Finney EM; Boynton GM; Dobkins KR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1621-37. PubMed ID: 16269101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cross-modal integration and plastic changes revealed by lip movement, random-dot motion and sign languages in the hearing and deaf.
Sadato N; Okada T; Honda M; Matsuki K; Yoshida M; Kashikura K; Takei W; Sato T; Kochiyama T; Yonekura Y
Cereb Cortex; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1113-22. PubMed ID: 15563723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Motion velocity thresholds in deaf signers: changes in lateralization but not in overall sensitivity.
Brozinsky CJ; Bavelier D
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15325408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures.
Goldin-Meadow S; Mylander C
Nature; 1998 Jan; 391(6664):279-81. PubMed ID: 9440690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers.
Emmorey K; Thompson R; Colvin R
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 18832075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
