These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15858563)

  • 1. Earth science: microseismicity data forecast rupture area.
    Schorlemmer D; Wiemer S
    Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7037):1086. PubMed ID: 15858563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake.
    Bakun WH; Aagaard B; Dost B; Ellsworth WL; Hardebeck JL; Harris RA; Ji C; Johnston MJ; Langbein J; Lienkaemper JJ; Michael AJ; Murray JR; Nadeau RM; Reasenberg PA; Reichle MS; Roeloffs EA; Shakal A; Simpson RW; Waldhauser F
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7061):969-74. PubMed ID: 16222291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 1985 central chile earthquake: a repeat of previous great earthquakes in the region?
    Comte D; Eisenberg A; Lorca E; Pardo M; Ponce L; Saragoni R; Singh SK; Suárez G
    Science; 1986 Jul; 233(4762):449-53. PubMed ID: 17794569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cape mendocino, california, earthquakes of april 1992: subduction at the triple junction.
    Oppenheimer D; Eaton J; Jayko A; Lisowski M; Marshall G; Murray M; Simpson R; Stein R; Beroza G; Magee M; Carver G; Dengler L; McPherson R; Gee L; Romanowicz B; Gonzalez F; Li WH; Satake K; Somerville P; Valentine D
    Science; 1993 Jul; 261(5120):433-8. PubMed ID: 17770022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slip deficit on the san andreas fault at parkfield, california, as revealed by inversion of geodetic data.
    Segall P; Harris R
    Science; 1986 Sep; 233(4771):1409-13. PubMed ID: 17830739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysing the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes with recent instrumentally recorded aftershocks.
    Mueller K; Hough SE; Bilham R
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6989):284-8. PubMed ID: 15152249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California.
    Gerstenberger MC; Wiemer S; Jones LM; Reasenberg PA
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):328-31. PubMed ID: 15902254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing time-predictable earthquake recurrence by direct measurement of strain accumulation and release.
    Murray J; Segall P
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6904):287-91. PubMed ID: 12239564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The parkfield, california, earthquake prediction experiment.
    Bakun WH; Lindh AG
    Science; 1985 Aug; 229(4714):619-24. PubMed ID: 17739363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures.
    Wesnousky SG
    Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7117):358-60. PubMed ID: 17108963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonvolcanic tremor evolution and the San Simeon and Parkfield, California, earthquakes.
    Nadeau RM; Guilhem A
    Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5937):191-3. PubMed ID: 19589999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The magnitude distribution of declustered earthquakes in Southern California.
    Knopoff L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 Oct; 97(22):11880-4. PubMed ID: 11035770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory earthquakes along inhomogeneous faults: directionality and supershear.
    Xia K; Rosakis AJ; Kanamori H; Rice JR
    Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5722):681-4. PubMed ID: 15860624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A great earthquake doublet and seismic stress transfer cycle in the central Kuril islands.
    Ammon CJ; Kanamori H; Lay T
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7178):561-5. PubMed ID: 18235499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking the rupture of the Mw = 9.3 Sumatra earthquake over 1,150 km at teleseismic distance.
    Krüger F; Ohrnberger M
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7044):937-9. PubMed ID: 15908983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microearthquake imaging of the parkfield asperity.
    Malin PE; Blakeslee SN; Alvarez MG; Martin AJ
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4904):557-9. PubMed ID: 17769398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial rupture of a locked patch of the Sumatra megathrust during the 2007 earthquake sequence.
    Konca AO; Avouac JP; Sladen A; Meltzner AJ; Sieh K; Fang P; Li Z; Galetzka J; Genrich J; Chlieh M; Natawidjaja DH; Bock Y; Fielding EJ; Ji C; Helmberger DV
    Nature; 2008 Dec; 456(7222):631-5. PubMed ID: 19052626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California.
    Allen RM; Kanamori H
    Science; 2003 May; 300(5620):786-9. PubMed ID: 12730599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The potential for giant tsunamigenic earthquakes in the northern Bay of Bengal.
    Cummins PR
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):75-8. PubMed ID: 17805292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A high-frequency secondary event during the 2004 Parkfield earthquake.
    Allmann BP; Shearer PM
    Science; 2007 Nov; 318(5854):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18033878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.