252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1585872)
1. Validity of cardiac output measurement by computer-averaged impedance cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations.
Pickett BR; Buell JC
Am J Cardiol; 1992 May; 69(16):1354-8. PubMed ID: 1585872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ
Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output: studies in rabbits.
Pappas CG; Wang X; Connolly RJ; Schwaitzberg SD
J Surg Res; 1995 Oct; 59(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 7564325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients.
Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D
Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Belardinelli R; Ciampani N; Costantini C; Blandini A; Purcaro A
Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 77(15):1293-301. PubMed ID: 8677869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of impedance cardiography measurements of cardiac output during limited exercise in heart transplant recipients.
Pepke-Zaba J; Higenbottam TW; Dinh Xuan AT; Scott JP; English TA; Wallwork J
Transpl Int; 1990 Jul; 3(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2206215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of continuous cardiac output monitoring derived from regional impedance cardiography with continuous thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients.
Bhavya G; Nagaraja PS; Singh NG; Ragavendran S; Sathish N; Manjunath N; Kumar KA; Nayak VB
Ann Card Anaesth; 2020; 23(2):189-192. PubMed ID: 32275034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of impedance cardiography.
Goldstein DS; Cannon RO; Zimlichman R; Keiser HR
Clin Physiol; 1986 Jun; 6(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 3087687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac output by impedance cardiography: two alternative methodologies compared with thermodilution.
Sherwood A; Carter LS; Murphy CA
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Feb; 62(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 2001207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of cardiac output using ensemble-averaged impedance cardiograms.
Muzi M; Ebert TJ; Tristani FE; Jeutter DC; Barney JA; Smith JJ
J Appl Physiol (1985); 1985 Jan; 58(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 3968011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM
Crit Care Med; 1999 Oct; 27(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 10548208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cardiac output monitoring by impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery].
Shimizu H; Seki S; Mizuguchi A; Tsuchida H; Watanabe H; Namiki A
Masui; 1990 Apr; 39(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 2362347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output during aortic surgery.
Sullivan PJ; Martineau RJ; Hull KA; Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 1990 May; 37(4 Pt 2):S78. PubMed ID: 2361316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution.
Faini A; Omboni S; Tifrea M; Bubenek S; Lazar O; Parati G
Blood Press; 2014 Apr; 23(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 23926884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac output determinations in the pig--thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Jivegård L; Frid I; Haljamäe H; Holm J; Holm S; Wickström I
Crit Care Med; 1990 Sep; 18(9):995-8. PubMed ID: 2394124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Could Impedance Cardiography be a Non-Invasive Alternative Method of Measuring Cardiac Output in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension?
Yağmur B; Şimşek E; Kayıkçıoğlu M; Yüce Eİ; Bayazıt Candemir Y; Nalbantgil S; Moğolkoç N; Can L; Kültürsay H
Anatol J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 27(11):650-656. PubMed ID: 37466025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
