These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry in 186 patients with rectal cancer confirms an overlap in pelvic size between males and females. Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G; Heald RJ; Moran BJ Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):772-6. PubMed ID: 17032323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Deep rectum resection and inter-sphincter rectum excision. Comment on the contribution by H.-P. Bruch and G. Kolbert]. Germer CT; Isbert C Chirurg; 1998 Jan; 69(1):111-3. PubMed ID: 9522089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Tilney HS; Tekkis PP Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):3-15; discussion 15-6. PubMed ID: 17477848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases. Baik SH; Kim NK; Lee KY; Sohn SK; Cho CH; Kim MJ; Kim H; Shinn RK Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 18058183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Function vs fate? Winslet M Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 18078458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for rectal cancer in a provincial centre: time to follow the standards? Welch MJ; Meiyappan V; Moot AR N Z Med J; 2013 Mar; 126(1370):119-21. PubMed ID: 23474523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining pelvic factors in sphincter-preservation of low rectal cancer with a three-dimensional digital model of pelvis. Gu J; Bo XF; Xiong CY; Wu AW; Zhang XP; Li M; An Q; Fang J; Li J; Zhang X; Wang HY; Gao F; You WC Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Oct; 49(10):1517-26. PubMed ID: 17001440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nodal staging in rectal cancer. Koh DM; Brown G; Husband JE Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(6):652-9. PubMed ID: 16897279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer. Killeen T; Banerjee S; Vijay V; Al-Dabbagh Z; Francis D; Warren S Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2974-9. PubMed ID: 20464426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-Tesla rectal magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative local staging of primary rectal cancer. Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee MW; Kim GH; Han JK; Choi BI Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):587-93. PubMed ID: 18648259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Surgical therapy for colorectal neoplasms--surgical removal of hepatic metastases and rectal neoplasms]. Iiai T; Tani T; Maruyama S; Shirai Y; Hatakeyama K Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Feb; 96(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17370593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the low rectum: defining the radiological anatomy. Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8 Suppl 3():10-3. PubMed ID: 16813585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Killeen T; Banerjee S; Vijay V; Al-Dabbagh Z; Francis D; Warren S Surg Endosc; 2012 Jan; 26(1):277. PubMed ID: 21614664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]