630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15859990)
1. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cosmetic dermatitis in Chinese eczema patients patch tested with a modified European standard series of allergens.
Wang WH; Li LF; Lu XY; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 16364117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances.
van Oosten EJ; Schuttelaar ML; Coenraads PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 19825093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis.
Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 135(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 8949436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007.
Thyssen JP; Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18844700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review.
Scheinman PL
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 8796745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I).
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Lindberg M; Fischer T; Elsner P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 8796746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance.
Färm G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragrance contact allergic patients: strategies for use of cosmetic products and perceived impact on life situation.
Lysdal SH; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Dec; 61(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 20059491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances.
Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Aug; 47(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 12423404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy.
Heisterberg MV; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 20946455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
