These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15859990)
1. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China. Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cosmetic dermatitis in Chinese eczema patients patch tested with a modified European standard series of allergens. Wang WH; Li LF; Lu XY; Wang J Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 16364117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances. van Oosten EJ; Schuttelaar ML; Coenraads PJ Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 19825093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis. Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T Br J Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 135(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 8949436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis. Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007. Thyssen JP; Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18844700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review. Scheinman PL Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 8796745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contact allergy to fragrances]. Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period. Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I). Larsen W; Nakayama H; Lindberg M; Fischer T; Elsner P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott J Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 8796746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period. Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance. Färm G Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study. Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragrance contact allergic patients: strategies for use of cosmetic products and perceived impact on life situation. Lysdal SH; Johansen JD Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Dec; 61(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 20059491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series. Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ; Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; White IR Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Aug; 47(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 12423404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy. Heisterberg MV; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 20946455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]