630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15859990)
21. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
Wongpiyabovorn J; Puvabanditsin P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S177-83. PubMed ID: 16623025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2021 consecutively patch tested patients. Results of the IVDK.
Schnuch A; Uter W; Geier J; Lessmann H; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Mar; 50(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 15153123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicentre patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde.
Isaksson M; Inerot A; Lidén C; Matura M; Stenberg B; Möller H; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Jul; 65(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 21595700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients' histories.
Johansen JD; Andersen TF; Kjøller M; Veien N; Avnstorp C; Andersen KE; Menné T
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 9601907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive.
Heisterberg MV; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Nov; 65(5):266-75. PubMed ID: 21943251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix.
Devos SA; Constandt L; Tupker RA; Noz KC; Lucker GP; Bruynzeel DP; Schuttelaar ML; Kruyswijk MR; van Zuuren EJ; Vink J; Coenraads PJ; Kiemeney LA; van der Valk PG
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18346396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A review of 241 subjects who were patch tested twice: could fragrance mix I cause active sensitization?
White JM; McFadden JP; White IR
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 158(3):518-21. PubMed ID: 18205877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sesquiterpene lactone mix patch testing supplemented with dandelion extract in patients with allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis and non-allergic chronic inflammatory skin diseases.
Jovanović M; Poljacki M; Mimica-Dukić N; Boza P; Vujanović Lj; Duran V; Stojanović S
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 15479198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
Trattner A; David M
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contact reactions to fragrances.
Katsarou A; Armenaka M; Kalogeromitros D; Koufou V; Georgala S
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 May; 82(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 10353576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Contact allergy for perfume ingredients in cosmetics and toilet articles].
de Groot AC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Mar; 141(12):571-4. PubMed ID: 9190522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
Disphanurat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Deodorants are the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance ingredients.
Heisterberg MV; Menné T; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Henrik Nielsen N; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 May; 64(5):258-64. PubMed ID: 21480912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A link between skin and airways regarding sensitivity to fragrance products?
Elberling J; Linneberg A; Mosbech H; Dirksen A; Frølund L; Madsen F; Nielsen NH; Johansen JD
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Dec; 151(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 15606515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005.
White JM; White IR; Glendinning A; Fleming J; Jefferies D; Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Buckley DA
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 157(3):580-2. PubMed ID: 17573874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Colophonium and Compositae mix as markers of fragrance allergy: cross-reactivity between fragrance terpenes, colophonium and compositae plant extracts.
Paulsen E; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 16283907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
