These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15861986)

  • 1. How probability survey data can help integrate 305(b) and 303(d) monitoring and assessment of state waters.
    Brown BS; Detenbeck NE; Eskin R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Apr; 103(1-3):41-57. PubMed ID: 15861986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Watershed-based survey designs.
    Detenbeck NE; Cincotta D; Denver JM; Greenlee SK; Olsen AR; Pitchford AM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Apr; 103(1-3):59-81. PubMed ID: 15861987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating sentinel watershed-systems into the monitoring and assessment of Minnesota's (USA) waters quality.
    Magner JA; Brooks KN
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Mar; 138(1-3):149-58. PubMed ID: 17505901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring of waters intended for abstraction.
    Dixon AG
    J R Soc Health; 1992 Apr; 112(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 1573628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clean Water Act assessment processes in relation to changing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency management strategies.
    Cooter WS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Oct; 38(20):5265-73. PubMed ID: 15543725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Nationally consistent NHDPlus framework for identifying interstate waters: implications for integrated assessments and interjurisdictional TMDLs.
    Cooter W; Rineer J; Bergenroth B
    Environ Manage; 2010 Sep; 46(3):510-24. PubMed ID: 20625899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new paradigm for clean water infrastructure.
    Sandino J
    Water Environ Res; 2006 Jan; 78(1):3. PubMed ID: 16553159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economics of place-based monitoring under the safe drinking water act, part II: design and development of place-based monitoring strategies.
    Brands E; Rajagopal R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Aug; 143(1-3):91-102. PubMed ID: 17882517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the US Clean Water Act 303(d) listing process for determining impairment of a waterbody.
    Keller AA; Cavallaro L
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Mar; 86(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 17270339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economics of place-based monitoring under the safe drinking water act, part I: spatial and temporal patterns of contaminants, and design of screening strategies.
    Brands E; Rajagopal R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Aug; 143(1-3):75-89. PubMed ID: 17882518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new perspective on water quality: Exploring spatial and temporal patterns of impaired waters.
    Jordan MA; Rogers SR
    J Environ Manage; 2024 May; 359():120983. PubMed ID: 38703645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated analysis of water quality parameters for cost-effective faecal pollution management in river catchments.
    Nnane DE; Ebdon JE; Taylor HD
    Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2235-46. PubMed ID: 21324505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conservation of blackwater rivers and streams of the coastal plains of United States: Knowledge and research needs.
    Flotemersch JE
    Ambio; 2023 Mar; 52(3):665-677. PubMed ID: 36595215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting water quality impaired stream segments using landscape-scale data and a regional geostatistical model: a case study in Maryland.
    Peterson EE; Urquhart NS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):615-38. PubMed ID: 16967209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economics of place-based monitoring under the safe drinking water act, part III: performance evaluation of place-based monitoring strategies.
    Brands E; Rajagopal R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Aug; 143(1-3):103-20. PubMed ID: 17882516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems.
    Davies SP; Jackson SK
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Aug; 16(4):1251-66. PubMed ID: 16937795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Assessment system for watershed ecological health in the United States: development and application].
    Zhang H; Luo YM
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Jul; 24(7):2063-72. PubMed ID: 24175541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the probability-based Maryland Biological Stream Survey to the state's assessment of water quality standards.
    Southerland MT; Vølstad JH; Weber ED; Klauda RJ; Poukish CA; Rowe MC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Mar; 150(1-4):65-73. PubMed ID: 19067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for comparative analysis of recovery potential in impaired waters restoration planning.
    Norton DJ; Wickham JD; Wade TG; Kunert K; Thomas JV; Zeph P
    Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 44(2):356-68. PubMed ID: 19452204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of Albanian natural waters and the human impact.
    Cullaj A; Hasko A; Miho A; Schanz F; Brandl H; Bachofen R
    Environ Int; 2005 Jan; 31(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 15607787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.