These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15862651)

  • 1. RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study.
    Graf H; Lauer UA; Berger A; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 23(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15862651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. rf enhancement and shielding in MRI caused by conductive implants: dependence on electrical parameters for a tube model.
    Graf H; Steidle G; Lauer UA; Schick F
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 15789577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects on MRI due to altered rf polarization near conductive implants or instruments.
    Graf H; Steidle G; Martirosian P; Lauer UA; Schick F
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 16485418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].
    Graf H; Klemm T; Lauer UA; Duda S; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1711-9. PubMed ID: 14661144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
    Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metal artifacts caused by gradient switching.
    Graf H; Steidle G; Martirosian P; Lauer UA; Schick F
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Jul; 54(1):231-4. PubMed ID: 15968663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aneurysm clip MR artifacts. Titanium versus stainless steel and influence of imaging parameters.
    Burtscher IM; Owman T; Romner B; Ståhlberg F; Holtås S
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Jan; 39(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 9498874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion. A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences.
    Rudisch A; Kremser C; Peer S; Kathrein A; Judmaier W; Daniaux H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 9549791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of direct current in electrically active implants using MRI methods.
    Wojtczyk H; Graf H; Martirosian P; Ballweg V; Kraiger M; Pintaske J; Schick F
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 21277177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
    Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduction of metal artefacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Vandevenne JE; Vanhoenacker FM; Parizel PM; Butts Pauly K; Lang RK
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 18085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Knee implant imaging at 3 Tesla using high-bandwidth radiofrequency pulses.
    Bachschmidt TJ; Sutter R; Jakob PM; Pfirrmann CW; Nittka M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1570-80. PubMed ID: 25155582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Metallic Artifacts Caused by Nonpenetrating Titanium Clips in Postoperative Neuroimaging.
    Ito K; Seguchi T; Nakamura T; Chiba A; Hasegawa T; Nagm A; Horiuchi T; Hongo K
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 96():16-22. PubMed ID: 27586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts.
    Bartels LW; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
    Magn Reson Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):171-80. PubMed ID: 11754456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal artifacts of hip arthroplasty implants at 1.5-T and 3.0-T: a closer look into the B
    Khodarahmi I; Kirsch J; Chang G; Fritz J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2021 May; 50(5):1007-1015. PubMed ID: 32918566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Venous Stents at 1.5 T: Susceptibility Artifacts and Radiofrequency Shielding.
    Reiss S; Özen AC; Lottner T; Reichert A; Massmann A; Bock M
    Invest Radiol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):741-746. PubMed ID: 32604387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips.
    Genson CC; Blane CE; Helvie MA; Waits SA; Chenevert TL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17242244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.