These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15863345)

  • 1. Computational modelling of a total knee prosthetic loaded in a dynamic knee simulator.
    Guess TM; Maletsky LP
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):357-67. PubMed ID: 15863345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics.
    Halloran JP; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 15598460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months.
    Heinlein B; Kutzner I; Graichen F; Bender A; Rohlmann A; Halder AM; Beier A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 May; 24(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 19285767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and validation of a general purpose robotic testing system for musculoskeletal applications.
    Noble LD; Colbrunn RW; Lee DG; van den Bogert AJ; Davis BL
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):025001. PubMed ID: 20370251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patellar tendon strain is increased at the site of the jumper's knee lesion during knee flexion and tendon loading: results and cadaveric testing of a computational model.
    Lavagnino M; Arnoczky SP; Elvin N; Dodds J
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2110-8. PubMed ID: 18768702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bearing movement after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a mathematical model.
    O'Connor J; Imran A
    Orthopedics; 2007 May; 30(5 Suppl):42-5. PubMed ID: 17549867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational modeling of a dynamic knee simulator for reproduction of knee loading.
    Guess TM; Maletsky LP
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Dec; 127(7):1216-21. PubMed ID: 16502664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics.
    Baldwin MA; Clary CW; Fitzpatrick CK; Deacy JS; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb; 45(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 22209313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A subject specific multibody model of the knee with menisci.
    Guess TM; Thiagarajan G; Kia M; Mishra M
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jun; 32(5):505-15. PubMed ID: 20359933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator.
    Halloran JP; Clary CW; Maletsky LP; Taylor M; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081010. PubMed ID: 20670059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional surrogate contact modeling for computationally efficient dynamic simulation of total knee replacements.
    Lin YC; Haftka RT; Queipo NV; Fregly BJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041010. PubMed ID: 19275439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements.
    Werner FW; Ayers DC; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):349-55. PubMed ID: 15598463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ligament balancing in TKA: evaluation of a force-sensing device and the influence of patellar eversion and ligament release.
    Crottet D; Kowal J; Sarfert SA; Maeder T; Bleuler H; Nolte LP; Dürselen L
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1709-15. PubMed ID: 17094997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement.
    Mündermann A; Dyrby CO; D'Lima DD; Colwell CW; Andriacchi TP
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Sep; 26(9):1167-72. PubMed ID: 18404700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend.
    Baldwin MA; Clary C; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2341-8. PubMed ID: 19720376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
    Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative positions of the contacts on the cartilage surfaces of the knee joint.
    Walker PS; Yildirim G; Sussman-Fort J; Klein GR
    Knee; 2006 Oct; 13(5):382-8. PubMed ID: 16790353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design features of total knees for achieving normal knee motion characteristics.
    Walker PS; Sussman-Fort JM; Yildirim G; Boyer J
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18534451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of an augmentation patella prosthesis versus patelloplasty on revision patellar kinematics and quadriceps tendon force: an ex vivo study.
    Mountney J; Wilson DR; Paice M; Masri BA; Greidanus NV
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1219-31. PubMed ID: 18534488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee bending motion.
    Tamaki M; Tomita T; Watanabe T; Yamazaki T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):972-8. PubMed ID: 19033084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.