321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15864445)
1. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Anderson WW; Kim YK
Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Lorch PD; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Noor MA; Ortíz-Barrientos D
Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16502138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A further analysis of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura and D. persimilis : rejoinder to Noor and Ortíz-Barrientos.
Anderson WW; Kim YK
Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):328-30. PubMed ID: 16477520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
Massie KR; Markow TA
Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.
Higgie M; Blows MW
Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?
Higgie M; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 17879191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Hunter F; Moore AJ; Snook RR
J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1763-71. PubMed ID: 17714294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.
Jennings JH; Etges WJ
Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual isolation between North American and Bogota strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Kim YK; Ruiz-García M; Alvarez D; Phillips DR; Anderson WW
Behav Genet; 2012 May; 42(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 22065259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.
Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E
Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Snook RR; Robertson A; Crudgington HS; Ritchie MG
Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15864440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations.
Castrezana SJ; Markow TA
Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of male courtship song in species recognition in Drosophila montana.
Saarikettu M; Liimatainen JO; Hoikkala A
Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 15864441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae).
Urbanelli S; Porretta D
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1520-7. PubMed ID: 18363862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.
Castillo DM; Moyle LC
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 286(1899):20182535. PubMed ID: 30900533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus.
Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA
Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5753):1467. PubMed ID: 16322450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Peculiarities of the courtship song in the Drosophila melanogaster populations adapted to gradient of microecological conditions].
Iliadi KG; Kamyshev NG; Popov AV; Iliadi NN; Rashkovetskaia EL; Nevo E; Korol' AB
Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 2009; 45(5):478-85. PubMed ID: 19886194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection.
Blows MW; Higgie M
Am Nat; 2003 Feb; 161(2):240-53. PubMed ID: 12675370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
