These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15864445)

  • 1. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Noor MA; Ortíz-Barrientos D
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16502138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A further analysis of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura and D. persimilis : rejoinder to Noor and Ortíz-Barrientos.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):328-30. PubMed ID: 16477520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
    Massie KR; Markow TA
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 17879191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Hunter F; Moore AJ; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1763-71. PubMed ID: 17714294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.
    Jennings JH; Etges WJ
    Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual isolation between North American and Bogota strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kim YK; Ruiz-García M; Alvarez D; Phillips DR; Anderson WW
    Behav Genet; 2012 May; 42(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 22065259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.
    Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Snook RR; Robertson A; Crudgington HS; Ritchie MG
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15864440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations.
    Castrezana SJ; Markow TA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of male courtship song in species recognition in Drosophila montana.
    Saarikettu M; Liimatainen JO; Hoikkala A
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 15864441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae).
    Urbanelli S; Porretta D
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1520-7. PubMed ID: 18363862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.
    Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 286(1899):20182535. PubMed ID: 30900533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus.
    Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA
    Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5753):1467. PubMed ID: 16322450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Peculiarities of the courtship song in the Drosophila melanogaster populations adapted to gradient of microecological conditions].
    Iliadi KG; Kamyshev NG; Popov AV; Iliadi NN; Rashkovetskaia EL; Nevo E; Korol' AB
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 2009; 45(5):478-85. PubMed ID: 19886194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection.
    Blows MW; Higgie M
    Am Nat; 2003 Feb; 161(2):240-53. PubMed ID: 12675370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.