These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15864620)
1. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Lösch A; Scheuerle A; Rupp V; Auffarth G; Becker M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Apr; 243(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 15864620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry. Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients]. Schlote T; Landenberger H Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01 with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Waisbourd M; Shemesh G; Top LB; Lazar M; Loewenstein A Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):902-6. PubMed ID: 20306444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deviations between transpalpebral tonometry using TGDc-01 and Goldmann applanation tonometry depending on the IOP level. Troost A; Specht K; Krummenauer F; Yun SH; Schwenn O Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 243(9):853-8. PubMed ID: 16158308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of portable TGDc-01 tonometers and comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer]. Rombold F; Thiel MJ; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C; Kampik A Ophthalmologe; 2005 Feb; 102(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 15290200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of the new TGDc-01 "PRA" palpebral tonometer: comparison with contact and non-contact tonometry. García Resúa C; Giráldez Fernández MJ; Cerviño Expósito A; González Pérez J; Yebra-Pimentel E Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 82(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 15711462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Transpalpebral tonometry with a digital tonometer in healthy eyes and after penetrating keratoplasty]. Amm M; Hedderich J Ophthalmologe; 2005 Jan; 102(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15322801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Li Y; Shi J; Duan X; Fan F Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 248(12):1765-70. PubMed ID: 20495818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transpalpebral tonometry: reliability and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry and palpation in healthy volunteers. Troost A; Yun SH; Specht K; Krummenauer F; Schwenn O Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 89(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 15722303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurements of intraocular pressure by Goldmann tonometry, Tonopen XL, and the transpalpebral tonometer, TGDc-01, after penetrating keratoplasty: a comparativye study. Shemesh G; Waisbourd M; Varssano D; Michaeli A; Lazar M; Kurtz S Cornea; 2009 Aug; 28(7):724-7. PubMed ID: 19574919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the impedance tonometers TGDc-01 and iCare according to the international ocular tonometer standards ISO 8612. Ruokonen PC; Schwenteck T; Draeger J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 245(9):1259-65. PubMed ID: 17318572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the digital tonometer TGDc-01 'PRA' and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Meyer MW; Gockeln R; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C Ophthalmic Res; 2004; 36(5):250-4. PubMed ID: 15583430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer]. Müller A; Godenschweger L; Lang GE; Kampmeier J Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Sep; 221(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 15459844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?]. Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*. van der Jagt LH; Jansonius NM Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 16101949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements. AlMubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Nov; 91(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 18651843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The validity of a digital eyelid tonometer (TGDc-01) and its comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a pilot study. Lam AK; Lam CH; Chan R Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 May; 25(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 15854065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes]. Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients. Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]