These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15865591)
1. Improving the governance of health research. Walsh MK; McNeil JJ; Breen KJ Med J Aust; 2005 May; 182(9):468-71. PubMed ID: 15865591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research governance and change in research ethics practices at a major Australian university. Krastev Y; Grimm M; Metcalfe A Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):16.1-7. PubMed ID: 22397091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical decision making in committee. A view from Germany. Sass HM Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):65-81. PubMed ID: 15282922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research? McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting human research from an invasion of privacy: the unintended results of the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988. Bentley-Cooper JE Aust J Public Health; 1991 Sep; 15(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1932329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Canadian governance of health research involving human subjects: is anybody minding the store? McDonald M Health Law J; 2001; 9():1-21. PubMed ID: 12141216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The regulation of medical/scientific research practices involving experimentation on human beings. Laufer S Law Context; 1990; 8(1):78-105. PubMed ID: 16437806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Under the shelter of ethics. Lichterman BL J Int Bioethique; 2005; 16(3-4):77-9, 172. PubMed ID: 17048363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving protection for research subjects. Steinbrook R N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(18):1425-30. PubMed ID: 11986426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human embryonic stem cell research: an argument for national research review. Baylis F; Robert JS Account Res; 2006; 13(3):207-24. PubMed ID: 17124758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reflections on governance models for the clinical translation of stem cells. Sugarman J J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 20579248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical research. Mandatory ethics recommendations. Sarma V Nature; 1983 Jan; 301(5896):103. PubMed ID: 6823286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed model federal policy for protection of human subjects; response to the First Biennial Report of the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(106):20204-17. PubMed ID: 11658721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical regulation or regulating ethics? The need for both internal and external governance of human experimentation. Tomossy GF Monash Bioeth Rev; 2002 Oct; 21(4):S59-65. PubMed ID: 15835014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics committees in the United States. Capron AM Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Time, place, and consciousness: three dimensions of meaning for US institutional review boards. Putney SB; Gruskin S Am J Public Health; 2002 Jul; 92(7):1067-70. PubMed ID: 12084680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. JAMA; 1996 Aug; 276(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 8683820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]