528 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15866130)
1. Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol.
Pannu HK; Thompson RE; Phelps J; Magee CA; Fishman EK
Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 15866130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood pool and liver enhancement in CT with liposomal lodixanol: comparison with lohexol.
Desser TS; Rubin DL; Muller H; McIntire GL; Bacon ER; Toner JL
Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 10898037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of iodinated contrast agent properties on renal kinetics and oxygenation.
Lenhard DC; Frisk AL; Lengsfeld P; Pietsch H; Jost G
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 23262792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus: does iso-osmolar contrast agent improve vascular opacification?
Goodman LR; Gulsun M; Nagy P; Washington L
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):923-8. PubMed ID: 15665223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancement of hepatic parenchyma, aorta, and portal vein in helical CT: comparison of iodixanol and iopromide.
Graf O; Gazelle GS; Kreuzer S; Halpern EF; Boehm P; Lechner G; Mueller PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):213-7. PubMed ID: 8976948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The osmolality of nonionic, iodinated contrast agents as an important factor for renal safety.
Lenhard DC; Pietsch H; Sieber MA; Ernst R; Lengsfeld P; Ellinghaus P; Jost G
Invest Radiol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):503-10. PubMed ID: 22864374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-osmolar monomeric versus iso-osmolar dimeric contrast media: an intra-individual comparison in CT angiography using an animal model.
Behrendt FF; Pietsch H; Jost G; Keil S; Mottaghy FM; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Apr; 55(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 21501406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elimination of the non-ionic X-ray contrast media iodixanol and iohexol in patients with severely impaired renal function.
Nossen JO; Jakobsen JA; Kjaersgaard P; Andrew E; Jacobsen PB; Berg KJ
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1995 Jul; 55(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7569737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of the viscosity and osmolality of iodine contrast agents on renal elimination.
Jost G; Pietsch H; Lengsfeld P; Hütter J; Sieber MA
Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 20375847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronary computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery bypass grafts: comparison between low-concentration Iodixanol 270 and Iohexol 350.
Wang H; Xu L; Zhang N; Fan Z; Zhang Z; Sun Z
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 25299799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
Sahani DV; Soulez G; Chen KM; Lepanto L; Xu JR; Nelson RC; Grazioli L; Vanzulli A; Heiken JP;
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time course of biodistribution and changes in density following administration of iobitridol in rabbits. A comparative study vs iohexol.
Rouleau P; Alison D; Bertrand P; Benderbous S; Havard P; Chambon C
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():49-55. PubMed ID: 8619352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic iodinated low-osmolar contrast media on platelet function with the PFA-100 (platelet function analyzer).
D'Anglemont De Tassigny A; IDéE JM; Corot AC
Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):276-82. PubMed ID: 11323515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ionic mechanisms contributing to the vasorelaxant properties of iodinated contrast media: a comparison of iohexol and iodixanol in the rabbit isolated aorta.
Pitman MR; Karlsson JO; Griffith TM
Br J Pharmacol; 1996 Oct; 119(4):685-90. PubMed ID: 8904642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of excretory urographic contrast effects of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic iodinated contrast media in dogs.
Kishimoto M; Yamada K; Watanabe A; Miyamoto K; Iwasaki T; Miyake Y
J Vet Med Sci; 2007 Jul; 69(7):713-5. PubMed ID: 17675802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography.
Aspelin P; Aubry P; Fransson SG; Strasser R; Willenbrock R; Berg KJ;
N Engl J Med; 2003 Feb; 348(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 12571256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing residual renal function and efficiency of hemodialysis--an application for urographic contrast media.
Sterner G; Frennby B; Månsson S; Ohlsson A; Prütz KG; Almén T
Nephron; 2000 Aug; 85(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 10940743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast enhancement in electron beam tomography of the heart: comparison of a monomeric and a dimeric iodinated contrast agent in 59 patients.
Enzweiler CN; Höhn S; Taupitz M; Lembcke AE; Wiese TH; Hamm B; Kivelitz DE
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 16399037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of osmolarity of contrast medium and saline flush on computed tomography angiography: comparison of monomeric and dimeric iodinated contrast media with different iodine concentrations at an identical iodine delivery rate.
Kishimoto M; Doi S; Shimizu J; Lee KJ; Iwasaki T; Miyake Y; Yamada K
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 19501993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
