BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15866131)

  • 1. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Zeng D; Muller K; Aylward SR; Park S; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Walsh R; Baker J; Gimenez EI; Freimanis R
    Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):585-95. PubMed ID: 15866131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Hemminger BM; Brown ML; Johnston RE; Kuzmiak CM; Braeuning MP; Freimanis RI; Soo MS; Baker JA; Walsh R
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 11997557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
    Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.
    Cole E; Pisano ED; Brown M; Kuzmiak C; Braeuning MP; Kim HH; Jong R; Walsh R
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86. PubMed ID: 15288038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and wavelet-enhanced monitor-displayed mammograms: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Kallergi M; Clarke LP; Qian W; Gavrielides M; Venugopal P; Berman CG; Holman-Ferris SD; Miller MS; Clark RA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 8796676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical and clinical comparison between a screen-film system and a dual-side reading mammography-dedicated computed radiography system.
    Rivetti S; Canossi B; Battista R; Lanconelli N; Vetruccio E; Danielli C; Borasi G; Torricelli P
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1109-18. PubMed ID: 19922306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved interpretation of digitized mammography with wavelet processing: a localization response operating characteristic study.
    Kallergi M; Heine JJ; Berman CG; Hersh MR; Romilly AP; Clark RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 14975972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.
    Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Claus F; Celis V; Geniets C; Provost V; Pauwels H; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 19378737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
    Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.
    Hendrick RE; Cole EB; Pisano ED; Acharyya S; Marques H; Cohen MA; Jong RA; Mawdsley GE; Kanal KM; D'Orsi CJ; Rebner M; Gatsonis C
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 18372463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Solari M; Barke L; Reddy D; Wolfman J; Segal L; DeLeon P; Benjamin S; Willis L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16794152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Hemminger BM; Yaffe MJ; Aylward SR; Maidment AD; Johnston RE; Williams MB; Niklason LT; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Kopans DB; Brown ME; Pizer SM
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1479-91. PubMed ID: 10992035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital luminescence mammography. Early clinical experience.
    Jarlman O; Samuelsson L; Braw M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 2031792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM; Acharyya S; Gatsonis C; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Marques HS; D'Orsi CJ; Farria DM; Kanal KM; Mahoney MC; Rebner M; Staiger MJ;
    Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19332845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.