128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15866412)
1. The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine.
Cook RB; Collins D; Tucker J; Zioupos P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 May; 31(5):625-32. PubMed ID: 15866412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.
Cook RB; Collins D; Tucker J; Zioupos P
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1565-75. PubMed ID: 15883661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Bone density measurement: quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and distal radius. A comparison with dual spectrum X-ray absorptiometry].
Boyanov M; Shinkov A; Nestorova R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 Apr; 132(16):869-73. PubMed ID: 17443442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ultrasonic assessment of osteopenia as defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Herd RJ; Blake GM; Miller CG; Parker JC; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):631-5. PubMed ID: 8061996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discriminatory ability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Turk N; Kastelan D; Cukovic-Cavka S; Kraljevic I; Korsic M; Vucelic B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 17434664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The clinical value of calcaneus stiffness index calculated by quantitative ultrasound test in screening and diagnosis of osteoporosis].
Hu Y; Li Q; Lin H; Shi L; Ma H; Chen Y; Gao X
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 54(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 25877142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in long-term liver or cardiac transplantation patients.
Díaz-Guerra GM; Gil-Fraguas L; Jódar E; Meneu JC; García E; Gómez MA; Moreno E; Hawkins F
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 17097534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteopenia and Osteoporosis Screening Detection: Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound with and without Calibration Factor Comparison to Gold Standard Dual X-ray Absorptiometry.
Moonkum N; Withayanuluck T; Somarungsan A; Sichai N; Wongsiri A; Chawkhaodin W; Ruengdach P; Boonsuk P; Pukdeeyorng M; Tochaikul G
J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(2):101470. PubMed ID: 38342001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of quantitative heel ultrasonography with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
Larijani B; Dabbaghmanesh MH; Aghakhani S; Sedaghat M; Hamidi Z; Rahimi E
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Jul; 24(7):941-6. PubMed ID: 15972708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients.
Li C; Sun J; Yu L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jan; 101(2):e28325. PubMed ID: 35029176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in detecting high-risk populations for osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men.
Zha XY; Hu Y; Pang XN; Chang GL; Li L
J Bone Miner Metab; 2015 Mar; 33(2):230-8. PubMed ID: 24748148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [X-ray densitometry and ultrasonography of the heel bone--sensitivity and comparison with densitometry of the axial skeleton].
Michalská D; Zikán V; Stĕpán J; Weichetová M; Kubová V; Krenková J; Masatová A
Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Apr; 139(8):231-6. PubMed ID: 10916211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.
Langton CM; Langton DK
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can low-frequency guided waves at the tibia paired with machine learning differentiate between healthy and osteopenic/osteoporotic subjects? A pilot study.
Vogl F; Friesenbichler B; Hüsken L; Kramers-de Quervain IA; Taylor WR
Ultrasonics; 2019 Apr; 94():109-116. PubMed ID: 30660337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A crossover comparison of four peripheral bone-site measurements to identify central osteopenia and osteoporosis in women.
Rosenthall L
Int Orthop; 2002; 26(6):328-33. PubMed ID: 12466863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
Formica CA; Nieves JW; Cosman F; Garrett P; Lindsay R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 9850355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]