These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15867143)

  • 1. Aortic input impedance increases with age in healthy men and women.
    Mazzaro L; Almasi SJ; Shandas R; Seals DR; Gates PE
    Hypertension; 2005 Jun; 45(6):1101-6. PubMed ID: 15867143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noninvasive (input) impedance, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflection in healthy middle-aged men and women.
    Segers P; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; Vermeersch SJ; De Bacquer D; Van Bortel LM; De Backer G; Gillebert TC; Verdonck PR;
    Hypertension; 2007 Jun; 49(6):1248-55. PubMed ID: 17404183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of aortic input impedance in mice: effects of age on aortic stiffness.
    Reddy AK; Li YH; Pham TT; Ochoa LN; Trevino MT; Hartley CJ; Michael LH; Entman ML; Taffet GE
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2003 Oct; 285(4):H1464-70. PubMed ID: 12775560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Aortic pressure and velocity signals processing: application to human aorta characterization (author's transl)].
    Fontenier G; Mérillon JP; Lerallut JF; Jaffrin MY; Motte G
    J Physiol (Paris); 1980; 76(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 7218163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of extraanatomic bypass on aortic input impedance studied in open chest dogs. Should the vascular prosthesis be compliant to unload the left ventricle?
    Morita S; Kuboyama I; Asou T; Tokunaga K; Nose Y; Nakamura M; Harasawa Y; Sunagawa K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Nov; 102(5):774-83. PubMed ID: 1834892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR and applanation tonometry derived aortic impedance: association with aging and left ventricular remodeling.
    Bargiotas I; Bollache E; Mousseaux E; Giron A; de Cesare A; Redheuil A; Kachenoura N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Mar; 41(3):781-7. PubMed ID: 24616151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.
    Nichols WW; Nicolini FA; Pepine CJ
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1992 Aug; 10(6):S73-7. PubMed ID: 1432333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic input impedance during nitroprusside infusion. A reconsideration of afterload reduction and beneficial action.
    Pepine CJ; Nichols WW; Curry RC; Conti CR
    J Clin Invest; 1979 Aug; 64(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 457874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Age-induced changes in the cardiovascular system in normal subjects].
    Badano L; Carratino L; Giunta L; Calisi P; Lucatti A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 22(9):1023-34. PubMed ID: 1291420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Autoregressive analysis of aortic input impedance: comparison with Fourier transform.
    Kubota T; Itaya R; Alexander J; Todaka K; Sugimachi M; Sunagawa K
    Am J Physiol; 1991 Mar; 260(3 Pt 2):H998-1002. PubMed ID: 2000993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vascular load defined by the aortic input impedance spectrum.
    Nichols WW; Pepine CJ; Geiser EA; Conti CR
    Fed Proc; 1980 Feb; 39(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 7353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dimensions of the proximal thoracic aorta from childhood to adult age: reference values for two-dimensional echocardiography. Ligurian Group of SIEC (Italian Society of Echocardiography)].
    Cassottana P; Badano L; Piazza R; Copello F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 27(7):686-96. PubMed ID: 9303859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of mean pressure on aortic impedance and reflections in the systemic arterial system.
    Alexander J; Burkhoff D; Schipke J; Sagawa K
    Am J Physiol; 1989 Sep; 257(3 Pt 2):H969-78. PubMed ID: 2782451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aminoguanidine prevents age-related aortic stiffening in Fisher 344 rats: aortic impedance analysis.
    Chang KC; Hsu KL; Peng YI; Lee FC; Tseng YZ
    Br J Pharmacol; 2003 Sep; 140(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 12967940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of nitroglycerin on left ventricular hydraulic load.
    Fitchett DH; Simkus G; Genest J; Marpole D; Beaudry P
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 4(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 3130171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of methods to determine the functional arterial parameters stiffness and resistance.
    Westerhof N; Westerhof BE
    J Hypertens; 2013 Sep; 31(9):1769-75. PubMed ID: 23777762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrelationship between noninvasive predictors of atherosclerosis: transthoracic coronary flow reserve, flow-mediated dilation, carotid intima-media thickness, aortic stiffness, aortic distensibility, elastic modulus, and brachial artery diameter.
    Gullu H; Erdogan D; Caliskan M; Tok D; Yildirim E; Ulus T; Turan Sezgin A; Muderrisoglu H
    Echocardiography; 2006 Nov; 23(10):835-42. PubMed ID: 17069601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-dependent increase in aortic stiffness during negative intrathoracic pressure in healthy subjects.
    Virolainen J; Kupari M
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 71(10):878-82. PubMed ID: 8456775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Matrix metalloproteinase-3 genotype contributes to age-related aortic stiffening through modulation of gene and protein expression.
    Medley TL; Kingwell BA; Gatzka CD; Pillay P; Cole TJ
    Circ Res; 2003 Jun; 92(11):1254-61. PubMed ID: 12750310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic diameter as a function of age, gender, and body surface area.
    Pearce WH; Slaughter MS; LeMaire S; Salyapongse AN; Feinglass J; McCarthy WJ; Yao JS
    Surgery; 1993 Oct; 114(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 8211683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.