These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15867757)

  • 1. Mathematical derivation of the minimally acceptable all-porcelain margin angle.
    Dalvit DL; Jackson RA; Hawkins MC; Parker MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 15867757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: a comparison between two techniques.
    Zarone F; Epifania E; Leone G; Sorrentino R; Ferrari M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 May; 95(5):354-63. PubMed ID: 16679130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of modifying alumina air abrasion parameters on the fracture strength of a porcelain laminate restorative material.
    Addison O; Marquis PM; Fleming GJ
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1332-41. PubMed ID: 17194472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of stress distribution of 2 different tooth preparation designs in porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns.
    Oyar P; Ulusoy M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 16479766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive dentistry: paradigm shifts in preparation design.
    LeSage BP
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(2):97-101; quiz 102, 116. PubMed ID: 19583167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
    De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of occlusal contact size on interfacial stresses and failure of a bonded ceramic: FEA and monotonic loading analyses.
    Yi YJ; Kelly JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 17698187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to fracture of two all-ceramic crown materials following endodontic access.
    Wood KC; Berzins DW; Luo Q; Thompson GA; Toth JM; Nagy WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 16399273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Improved method of preparing crowns from porcelain].
    Demner LM; Bol'shakov VA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1982; (2):45-7. PubMed ID: 7046144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Customization of milled zirconia copings for all-ceramic crowns: a clinical report.
    Marchack BW; Futatsuki Y; Marchack CB; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 18319086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a reinforced slot design for CEREC system to restore extensively compromised premolars.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Chang WJ; Cheng MH
    J Dent; 2006 Mar; 34(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 16112335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.