These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1586845)

  • 1. Frequency selectivity as a potential measure of noise damage susceptibility.
    Bergman M; Najenson T; Korn C; Harel N; Erenthal P; Sachartov E
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Feb; 26(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 1586845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].
    Türkkahraman S; Gök U; Karlidağ T; Keleş E; Oztürk A
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 Apr; 10(4):137-42. PubMed ID: 12941983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing parameters in noise exposed industrial workers.
    Celik O; Yalçin S; Oztürk A
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Dec; 25(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 9853659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative analysis of audiometric and impedancemetric findings in workers exposed to the effects of various duration industrial noise].
    Zivić L; Ignjatović S; Terzić N; Jakovljević VLj; Zivić D; Djonović N
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Mar; 67(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20361699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined effects of ototoxic solvents and noise on hearing in automobile plant workers in Iran.
    Mohammadi S; Labbafinejad Y; Attarchi M
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2010 Sep; 61(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 20860967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-frequency hearing thresholds: effects of age, occupational ultrasound and noise exposure.
    Maccà I; Scapellato ML; Carrieri M; Maso S; Trevisan A; Bartolucci GB
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2015 Feb; 88(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 24923465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cross-sectional study of hearing thresholds among 4627 Norwegian train and track maintenance workers.
    Lie A; Skogstad M; Johnsen TS; Engdahl B; Tambs K
    BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e005529. PubMed ID: 25324318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2018 Oct; 91(7):877-885. PubMed ID: 29959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Permanent shift of auditory thresholds caused by continuous and impulse noise: comparative studies].
    Sułkowski W
    Med Pr; 1984; 35(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 6530954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices.
    Seixas NS; Goldman B; Sheppard L; Neitzel R; Norton S; Kujawa SG
    Occup Environ Med; 2005 May; 62(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 15837852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of industrial noise of higher spectrum on the workers’ auditory perception abilities.
    Mihailović D; Đurić N; Kovačević I; Mihailović Đ
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(11):1030-7. PubMed ID: 29328642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of jet engine noise on hearing of technical staff.
    Konopka W; Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Śliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2014; 65(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 25812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement between hearing thresholds measured in non-soundproof work environments and a soundproof booth.
    Wong TW; Yu TS; Chen WQ; Chiu YL; Wong CN; Wong AH
    Occup Environ Med; 2003 Sep; 60(9):667-71. PubMed ID: 12937188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiometric pattern in a group of workers with one ear conductive deafness exposed to continuous noise.
    Moneim IA
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 1996; 71(3-4):243-56. PubMed ID: 17217011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extended high-frequency audiometry in subjects exposed to occupational noise.
    Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    B-ENT; 2008; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18949961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.