These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15868717)

  • 21. Time-resolved DPIV investigation of pulsatile flow in symmetric stenotic arteries--effects of phase angle.
    Karri S; Vlachos PP
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Mar; 132(3):031010. PubMed ID: 20459198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.
    Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Lovstakken L; Segers P
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4318-30. PubMed ID: 20879592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-Newtonian effects of blood flow on hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses.
    Chen J; Lu XY; Wang W
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(11):1983-95. PubMed ID: 16055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developing pulsatile flow in a deployed coronary stent.
    Rajamohan D; Banerjee RK; Back LH; Ibrahim AA; Jog MA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 16706584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
    Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guidewire flow obstruction effect on pressure drop-flow relationship in moderate coronary artery stenosis.
    Sinha Roy A; Back LH; Banerjee RK
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(5):853-64. PubMed ID: 16488224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
    Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Haemodynamic analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting in a non-linear deformable artery and Newtonian pulsatile blood flow.
    Kouhi E; Morsi YS; Masood SH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Nov; 222(8):1273-87. PubMed ID: 19143420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Numerical analysis of the impact of flow rate, heart rate, vessel geometry, and degree of stenosis on coronary hemodynamic indices.
    Malota Z; Glowacki J; Sadowski W; Kostur M
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2018 Jun; 18(1):132. PubMed ID: 29954323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fluid flow structure in arterial bypass anastomosis.
    Su CM; Lee D; Tran-Son-Tay R; Shyy W
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Aug; 127(4):611-8. PubMed ID: 16121531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vivo validation of a one-dimensional finite-element method for predicting blood flow in cardiovascular bypass grafts.
    Steele BN; Wan J; Ku JP; Hughes TJ; Taylor CA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):649-56. PubMed ID: 12814231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
    Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    Khodarahmi I
    MAGMA; 2015 Aug; 28(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 25502616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS
    NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A computational fluid-structure interaction analysis of coronary Y-grafts.
    Guerciotti B; Vergara C; Ippolito S; Quarteroni A; Antona C; Scrofani R
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():117-127. PubMed ID: 28734873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemodynamics of the string phenomenon in the internal thoracic artery grafted to the left anterior descending artery with moderate stenosis.
    Zhao X; Liu Y; Li L; Wang W; Xie J; Zhao Z
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):983-991. PubMed ID: 26972762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemodynamic study in 3D printed stenotic coronary artery models: experimental validation and transient simulation.
    Carvalho V; Rodrigues N; Ribeiro R; Costa PF; Teixeira JCF; Lima RA; Teixeira SFCF
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 May; 24(6):623-636. PubMed ID: 33225743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computational simulation of intracoronary flow based on real coronary geometry.
    Boutsianis E; Dave H; Frauenfelder T; Poulikakos D; Wildermuth S; Turina M; Ventikos Y; Zund G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Aug; 26(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 15296879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.
    Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Sigfridsson A; Lantz J; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1249-55. PubMed ID: 25846511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts: a validation study with Doppler flow measurements.
    Langerak SE; Kunz P; Vliegen HW; Jukema JW; Zwinderman AH; Steendijk P; Lamb HJ; van der Wall EE; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 11756716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.