These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15870162)

  • 1. Interrater reliability: completing the methods description in medical records review studies.
    Yawn BP; Wollan P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 May; 161(10):974-7. PubMed ID: 15870162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical record review conduction model for improving interrater reliability of abstracting medical-related information.
    Engel L; Henderson C; Fergenbaum J; Colantonio A
    Eval Health Prof; 2009 Sep; 32(3):281-98. PubMed ID: 19679636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.
    Cassidy LD; Marsh GM; Holleran MK; Ruhl LS
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 8(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 12234019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: "Interrater reliability: completing the methods description in medical records review studies".
    Sheikh K
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 162(9):919; author reply 919-20. PubMed ID: 16150889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The loss of reliability in data extraction from clinical histories: the source of the flaws and the usefulness of training].
    Gómez de la Cámara A; Ciruelo Monge E; de la Cruz Bértolo J; Serrano Díaz JM; Pato Cour E; Gómez-Reino Carnota JJ
    Med Clin (Barc); 1997 Mar; 108(10):377-81. PubMed ID: 9139144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy and completeness of data collected by prospective and retrospective methods.
    Nagurney JT; Brown DF; Sane S; Weiner JB; Wang AC; Chang Y
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Sep; 12(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 16141025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pragmatic strategies that enhance the reliability of data abstracted from medical records.
    Eder C; Fullerton J; Benroth R; Lindsay SP
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 Feb; 18(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15812736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of EMS-recorded patient demographic data.
    Brice JH; Friend KD; Delbridge TR
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2008; 12(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 18379915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research.
    Worster A; Bledsoe RD; Cleve P; Fernandes CM; Upadhye S; Eva K
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Apr; 45(4):448-51. PubMed ID: 15795729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records.
    Zollinger TW; Przybylski MJ; Gamache RE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16039875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interrater reliability of hemodynamic profiling of patients with heart failure in the ED.
    Chaudhry A; Singer AJ; Chohan J; Russo V; Lee C
    Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 26(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 18272102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interrater reliability and accuracy of clinicians and trained research assistants performing prospective data collection in emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome.
    Cruz CO; Meshberg EB; Shofer FS; McCusker CM; Chang AM; Hollander JE
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 54(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19185392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement.
    Yi Q; Wang PP; He Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2816-25. PubMed ID: 17985364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using probabilistic corrections to account for abstractor agreement in medical record reviews.
    Lash TL; Fox MP; Thwin SS; Geiger AM; Buist DS; Wei F; Field TS; Yood MU; Frost FJ; Quinn VP; Prout MN; Silliman RA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 165(12):1454-61. PubMed ID: 17406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interrater reliability issues in multicenter trials, Part I: Theoretical concepts and operational procedures used in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #394.
    Tracy K; Adler LA; Rotrosen J; Edson R; Lavori P
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1997; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 9133751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to limit the burden of data collection for Quality Indicators based on medical records? The COMPAQH experience.
    Corriol C; Daucourt V; Grenier C; Minvielle E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Oct; 8():215. PubMed ID: 18940005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Intensity Level of Therapy (PILOT) scale: a measure of the use of intracranial pressure-directed therapies.
    Shore PM; Hand LL; Roy L; Trivedi P; Kochanek PM; Adelson PD
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1981-7. PubMed ID: 16691131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding data from child health records: the relationship between interrater agreement and interpretive burden.
    Hagelin EM
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1999 Oct; 14(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 10554444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apgar scores reported in personal child health records: validity for epidemiological studies?
    Troude P; L'Hélias LF; Raison-Boulley AM; Castel C; Bouyer J; de La Rochebrochard E
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2008 Nov; 44(11):665-9. PubMed ID: 18717766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.