173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15870519)
1. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
Ferris DG; Litaker M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1934-41. PubMed ID: 15592275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 16522401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical biopsy sampling variability in ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 21169866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Colposcopic Impression Based on Live Colposcopy and Evaluation of Static Digital Images.
Liu AH; Gold MA; Schiffman M; Smith KM; Zuna RE; Dunn ST; Gage JC; Walker JL; Wentzensen N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Apr; 20(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 27015261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopy Quality Control: Establishing Colposcopy Criterion Standards for the National Cancer Institute ALTS Trial Using Cervigrams.
Ferris DG; Cox JT; Burke L; Litaker MS; Harper DM; Campion MJ; Greenberg MD; McShane L; Wun LM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Oct; 2(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 25950212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy.
Ferris DG; Macfee MS; Miller JA; Litaker MS; Crawley D; Watson D
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 11814505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver agreement on interpreting hand drawings of colposcopy in women with borderline cytology to predict high-grade lesions.
Wensveen C; Kagie M; Nagelkerke N; Trimbos B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 16973255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading.
Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Schiffman M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18515509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.
Stoler MH; Schiffman M;
JAMA; 2001 Mar; 285(11):1500-5. PubMed ID: 11255427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study.
Petousis S; Christidis P; Margioula-Siarkou C; Sparangis N; Athanasiadis A; Kalogiannidis I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1271-1275. PubMed ID: 29442140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colposcopic scoring indexes in the evaluation of cervical lesions with the cytological result of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade lesion.
Kudela E; Laucekova Z; Nachajova M; Visnovsky J; Bielik T; Krivus S; Biringer K; Balharek T; Zubor P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Feb; 46(2):314-319. PubMed ID: 31814228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) in colposcopy: evaluation of a pilot study.
Mehlhorn G; Kage A; Münzenmayer C; Benz M; Koch MC; Beckmann MW; Wittenberg T
Anticancer Res; 2012 Dec; 32(12):5221-6. PubMed ID: 23225419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy.
Zhang X; Dou Y; Wang M; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():53-58. PubMed ID: 28850822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized colposcopy: results of a pilot study and analysis of its clinical relevance.
Cristoforoni PM; Gerbaldo D; Perino A; Piccoli R; Montz FJ; Capitanio GL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 7770246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis with 2011 international terminology of colposcopy and cervical pathology in cervical lesions].
Li Y; Zhang H; Zheng R; Xie F; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 May; 50(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 26311456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The increased detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia when using a second biopsy at colposcopy.
van der Marel J; van Baars R; Rodriguez A; Quint WG; van de Sandt MM; Berkhof J; Schiffman M; Torné A; Ordi J; Jenkins D; Verheijen RH; Helmerhorst TJ; Ter Harmsel B; Wentzensen N; Del Pino M
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 25204846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.
Massad LS; Collins YC
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jun; 89(3):424-8. PubMed ID: 12798706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
