156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1587087)
1. Analysis of three-dimensional software EIT (electrical impedance tomography) phantoms by the finite element method.
Kuzuoglu M; Moh'dSaid M; Ider YZ
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1992; 13 Suppl A():135-8. PubMed ID: 1587087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model.
Vauhkonen PJ; Vauhkonen M; Savolainen T; Kaipio JP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Sep; 46(9):1150-60. PubMed ID: 10493078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite-element method in electrical impedance tomography.
Woo EJ; Hua P; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1994 Sep; 32(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 7845069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary.
Jain H; Isaacson D; Edic PM; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Nov; 44(11):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9353984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prototype system and reconstruction algorithms for electrical impedance technique in medical body imaging.
Kim Y; Woo HW
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1987; 8 Suppl A():63-70. PubMed ID: 3568573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uniform background assumption produces misleading lung EIT images.
Grychtol B; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):579-93. PubMed ID: 23718942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
Boyle A; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distributed network imaging and electrical impedance tomography of minimally invasive surgery.
Otten DM; Onik G; Rubinsky B
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Apr; 3(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 15059018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental justification for using 3D conductivity reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S115-27. PubMed ID: 17664629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes.
Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Seo JK; Lee JY; Baek WS
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(13):1971-86. PubMed ID: 12884929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Errors due to the truncation of the computational domain in static three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
Vauhkonen PJ; Vauhkonen M; Kaipio JP
Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 10720008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
Wagenaar J; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
Woo EJ; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal distance of multi-plane sensor in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
Hao Z; Yue S; Sun B; Wang H
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):326-338. PubMed ID: 29037075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bladder volume estimation from electrical impedance tomography.
Schlebusch T; Nienke S; Santos SA; Leonhardt S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6441-4. PubMed ID: 24111216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
