These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15871077)

  • 1. New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval--in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency.
    Günther RW; Neuerburg J; Mossdorf A; Pfeffer J; Høj AR; Mølgaard-Nielsen A; Bücker A; Schmitz-Rode T
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 15871077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of optionally retrievable and permanent IVC filters.
    Mahnken AH; Pfeffer J; Stanzel S; Mossdorf A; Günther RW; Schmitz-Rode T
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 17568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of Günther Tulip and Celect filters: testing filtering efficiency and pressure drop.
    Nicolas M; Malvé M; Peña E; Martínez MA; Leask R
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25553669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
    Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters.
    Durack JC; Westphalen AC; Kekulawela S; Bhanu SB; Avrin DE; Gordon RL; Kerlan RK
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Apr; 35(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 21448771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Günther Tulip and Celect IVC filters in multiple-trauma patients.
    Rosenthal D; Kochupura PV; Wellons ED; Burkett AB; Methodius-Rayford WC
    J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Aug; 16(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 19702346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications of Celect, Günther tulip, and Greenfield inferior vena cava filters on CT follow-up: a single-institution experience.
    McLoney ED; Krishnasamy VP; Castle JC; Yang X; Guy G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1723-9. PubMed ID: 24041915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optional inferior vena cava filter retrieval with retained thrombus: an in vitro model.
    Kolbeck KJ; Itkin M; Cheatham L; Stavropoulos SW
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Apr; 17(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 16614152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval of Gunther Tulip optional vena cava filters 30 days after implantation: a prospective clinical study.
    De Gregorio MA; Gamboa P; Bonilla DL; Sanchez M; Higuera MT; Medrano J; Mainar A; Lostalé F; Laborda A
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Nov; 17(11 Pt 1):1781-9. PubMed ID: 17142708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deployment performance and retrievability of the Cook Celect vena cava filter.
    Smouse HB; Van Alstine WG; Mack S; McCann-Brown JA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 19179096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term retrieval of modified Günther Tulip vena cava Filters: an animal study.
    Buecker A; Behrendt FF; Knüchel R; Kinzel S; Mølgaard-Nielsen A; Neuerburg J; Günther RW
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Oct; 42(10):692-6. PubMed ID: 17984766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Determining the effectiveness of percutaneous cava filters: experimental studies].
    Neuerburg J; Haupt-Pichler A; Katterbach FJ; Eilers R; Siess T; Buro K; von Pichler C; Mottaghy K; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 8645868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and effectiveness of the celect inferior vena cava filter: preliminary results.
    Sangwaiya MJ; Marentis TC; Walker TG; Stecker M; Wicky ST; Kalva SP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1188-92. PubMed ID: 19631561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters: comparison with fluoroscopic guidance with use of in vitro and animal models.
    Shih MC; Rogers WJ; Hagspiel KD
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2 Pt 1):327-33. PubMed ID: 16517779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excimer laser-assisted retrieval of Günther Tulip vena cava filters: a pilot study in a canine Model.
    Saito N; Shimamoto T; Takeda T; Marui A; Kimura T; Ikeda T; Sakata R
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 May; 21(5):719-24. PubMed ID: 20307988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling blood flow in a tilted inferior vena cava filter: does tilt adversely affect hemodynamics?
    Singer MA; Wang SL
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 21211992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of snared-loop technique when standard retrieval of inferior vena cava filters fails.
    Doody O; Noë G; Given MF; Foley PT; Lyon SM
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 18839244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [In vitro evaluation of Dibie-Musset vena caval filter].
    Dibie A; Kareco T; Musset D; Dufaux J; Counord JL; Laborde F; Flaud P
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1994 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 7811146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified technique to minimize filter tilting during deployment of the Günther Tulip filter: in vitro study.
    Lopera JE; Araki JU; Kirsch D; Qian Z; Brazzini A; Gonzalez A; Castaneda-Zuniga W
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Nov; 16(11):1539-44. PubMed ID: 16319164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple emboli and filter function: an in vitro comparison of three vena cava filters.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kvernebo K; Laerum F
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 8850665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.