51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15874878)
1. Multicenter direct to vial evaluation of a liquid-based pap test.
Hatch KD; Sheets E; Kennedy A; Ferris DG; Darragh T; Twiggs L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2004 Oct; 8(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 15874878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of a liquid-based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer.
Weintraub J; Morabia A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jan; 22(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10613975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the Thin Prep Pap Test in clinical practice.
Guidos BJ; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Feb; 20(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 9951600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases.
Rahimi S; Carnovale-Scalzo C; Marani C; Renzi C; Malvasi A; Votano S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18973131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A large-scale investigator-sponsored field study of the test performance of the ThinPrep papanicolaou test in a low-risk routine outpatient setting.
Weintraub J; Wenger D
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):164. PubMed ID: 10838306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening parameters for ThinPrep and conventional gynecologic cytology via automated monitoring.
Hoerl HD; Shalkham JE; Cheung K; Hurlbert SD; Inhorn SL; Kurtycz DF
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):618-24. PubMed ID: 10934956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved Accuracy for Cervical Cytology with the ThinPrep Method and the Endocervical Brush-Spatula Collection Procedure.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Hutchinson ML
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jan; 2(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 25951356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of endometrial adenocarcinoma with the ThinPrep Pap test.
Guidos BJ; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Oct; 23(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 11002368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glandular lesions of the cervix on thin-layer Pap tests. Validity of cytologic criteria used in identifying significant lesions.
Ozkan F; Ramzy I; Mody DR
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(3):372-9. PubMed ID: 15192953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): human papillomavirus testing, ASCUS subtyping,or follow-up cytology?
Hughes SA; Sun D; Gibson C; Bellerose B; Rushing L; Chen H; Harlow BL; Genest DR; Sheets EE; Crum CP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 186(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 11904597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One hundred percent thorough quality control rescreening of liquid-based monolayers in cervicovaginal cytopathology.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Bentz JS
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12478679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of subclassification of squamous intraepithelial lesions: conventional versus ThinPrep paps.
Adams KC; Absher KJ; Brill YM; Witzke DB; Davey DD
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2003 Jul; 7(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 17051069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liquid-based cervical cytology.
Klinkhamer PJ; Meerding WJ; Rosier PF; Hanselaar AG
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14579292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
