199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15875253)
1. In vivo assessment of hydroxyapatite and silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite granules using an ovine defect model.
Patel N; Brooks RA; Clarke MT; Lee PM; Rushton N; Gibson IR; Best SM; Bonfield W
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 May; 16(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 15875253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study on the in vivo behavior of hydroxyapatite and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite granules.
Patel N; Best SM; Bonfield W; Gibson IR; Hing KA; Damien E; Revell PA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2002 Dec; 13(12):1199-206. PubMed ID: 15348666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of sintered silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite on remodelling processes at the bone-implant interface.
Porter AE; Patel N; Skepper JN; Best SM; Bonfield W
Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(16):3303-14. PubMed ID: 14980425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of carbonate substitution on the ultrastructural characteristics of hydroxyapatite implants.
Porter A; Patel N; Brooks R; Best S; Rushton N; Bonfield W
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 Oct; 16(10):899-907. PubMed ID: 16167098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone formation in a carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite implant is inhibited by zoledronate: the importance of bioresorption to osteoconduction.
Spence G; Phillips S; Campion C; Brooks R; Rushton N
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Dec; 90(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 19043138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro osteoclast formation and resorption of silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite ceramics.
Friederichs RJ; Brooks RA; Ueda M; Best SM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2015 Oct; 103(10):3312-22. PubMed ID: 25847383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of a bioresorbable nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite paste in acetabular bone impaction grafting.
Chris Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Schreurs BW; Buma P
Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(7):1110-8. PubMed ID: 16098583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accelerated degradation and improved bone-bonding ability of hydroxyapatite ceramics by the addition of glass.
So K; Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Anan Y; Ogawa T; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
Biomaterials; 2006 Sep; 27(27):4738-44. PubMed ID: 16753209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparation and characterization of gelatin-hydroxyapatite composite microspheres for hard tissue repair.
Chao SC; Wang MJ; Pai NS; Yen SK
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Dec; 57():113-22. PubMed ID: 26354246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of in vivo dissolution processes in hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite bioceramics.
Porter AE; Patel N; Skepper JN; Best SM; Bonfield W
Biomaterials; 2003 Nov; 24(25):4609-20. PubMed ID: 12951004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined Treatment Effects Using Bioactive-Coated Implants and Ceramic Granulate in a Rabbit Femoral Condyle Model.
Preethanath RS; Rajesh P; Varma H; Anil S; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 26115085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The chemical composition of synthetic bone substitutes influences tissue reactions in vivo: histological and histomorphometrical analysis of the cellular inflammatory response to hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics.
Ghanaati S; Barbeck M; Detsch R; Deisinger U; Hilbig U; Rausch V; Sader R; Unger RE; Ziegler G; Kirkpatrick CJ
Biomed Mater; 2012 Feb; 7(1):015005. PubMed ID: 22287541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of silicon level on rate, quality and progression of bone healing within silicate-substituted porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds.
Hing KA; Revell PA; Smith N; Buckland T
Biomaterials; 2006 Oct; 27(29):5014-26. PubMed ID: 16790272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resorbable and nonresorbable hydroxyapatite granules as bone graft substitutes in rabbit cortical defects.
Liljensten E; Adolfsson E; Strid KG; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 14536044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydroxyapatite granule/carrier composites promote new bone formation in cortical defects.
Liljensten EL; Attaelmanan AG; Larsson C; Ljusberg-Wahren H; Danielsen N; Hirsch JM; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 11359275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collagen-hydroxyapatite composites with applications as bone substitutes: synthesis and characterisation.
Flocea P; Popa M; Munteanu F; Vereştiuc L
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(1):286-92. PubMed ID: 21491817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brushite-based calcium phosphate cement with multichannel hydroxyapatite granule loading for improved bone regeneration.
Sarkar SK; Lee BY; Padalhin AR; Sarker A; Carpena N; Kim B; Paul K; Choi HJ; Bae SH; Lee BT
J Biomater Appl; 2016 Jan; 30(6):823-37. PubMed ID: 26333790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrastructural comparison of hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications.
Porter AE; Best SM; Bonfield W
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jan; 68(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 14661258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term in vivo experimental investigations on magnesium doped hydroxyapatite bone substitutes.
Sartori M; Giavaresi G; Tschon M; Martini L; Dolcini L; Fiorini M; Pressato D; Fini M
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1495-504. PubMed ID: 24554305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
