These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15875358)

  • 1. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
    Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
    Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Peristat Online Perimetry with the Humphrey Perimetry in a Clinic-Based Setting.
    Lowry EA; Hou J; Hennein L; Chang RT; Lin S; Keenan J; Wang SK; Ianchulev S; Pasquale LR; Han Y
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 5(4):4. PubMed ID: 27486554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early detection of glaucoma by means of a novel 3D computer-automated visual field test.
    Nazemi PP; Fink W; Sadun AA; Francis B; Minckler D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 17504855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Westcott MC; McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 9274408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
    Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel 3D computer-automated threshold Amsler grid visual field testing of scotomas in patients with glaucoma.
    Nguyen DT; Fahimi A; Fink W; Nazemi PP; Kim JK; Sadun AA
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):776-82. PubMed ID: 19787597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
    Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
    Bruun-Jensen J
    Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can DMCO Detect Visual Field Loss in Neurological Patients? A Secondary Validation Study.
    Olsen AS; Steensberg AT; la Cour M; Kjaer TW; Damato B; Pinborg LH; Kolko M
    Ophthalmic Res; 2017; 58(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 28535498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective perimetry in glaucoma: recent advances with multifocal stimuli.
    Graham SL; Klistorner A; Grigg JR; Billson FA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 43 Suppl 1():S199-209. PubMed ID: 10416764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between indices of Humphrey matrix and Humphrey perimetry in early glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Hong S; Yeom HY; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie); 2007; 39(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 18025653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.