BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15875978)

  • 1. Item-specific processing reduces false memories.
    McCabe DP; Presmanes AG; Robertson CL; Smith AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1074-9. PubMed ID: 15875978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():602347. PubMed ID: 33329270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
    McCabe DP; Smith AD
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative affect promotes encoding of and memory for details at the expense of the gist: affect, encoding, and false memories.
    Storbeck J
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(5):800-19. PubMed ID: 23134550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Namias JM; Huff MJ; Smith A; Maxwell NP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1571-1582. PubMed ID: 34661459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied.
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21500088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of test structure in creating false memories.
    Coane JH; McBride DM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17128601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
    Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.
    Hege AC; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):787-95. PubMed ID: 15238023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.
    Burns DJ; Jenkins CL; Dean EE
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18062541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: mood and the false memory effect.
    Storbeck J; Clore GL
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):785-91. PubMed ID: 16181441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of decision criterion in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false recognition memory: False memory falls and rises as a function of restriction on criterion setting.
    Jou J; Escamilla EE; Arredondo ML; Pena L; Zuniga R; Perez M; Garcia C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):499-521. PubMed ID: 27808007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generative processing and emotional false memories: a generation "cost" for negative false memory formation but only after delay.
    Knott L; Wilkinson S; Hellenthal M; Shah D; Howe ML
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Nov; 36(7):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 36196863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB; Watson JM; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 16156175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of early list manipulations on the DRM illusion.
    Fam J; Huff MJ; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Nov; 74(11):1924-1934. PubMed ID: 33840269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False memory in a short-term memory task.
    Coane JH; McBride DM; Raulerson BA; Jordan JS
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 17341016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-induced priming of false memories.
    Marsh EJ; Dolan PO
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 17874592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Hancock TW; Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12710219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.