These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15875980)

  • 1. It's not what you hear but how often you hear it: on the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1084-9. PubMed ID: 15875980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: the role of variant frequency.
    Connine CM; Ranbom LJ; Patterson DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Apr; 70(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 18459250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonological variant recognition: representations and rules.
    Pinnow E; Connine CM
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):42-67. PubMed ID: 24754220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is phonological context always used to recognize variant forms in spoken word recognition? The role of variant frequency and context distribution.
    Ranbom LJ; Connine CM; Yudman EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1205-20. PubMed ID: 19653759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations.
    Brouwer S; Mitterer H; Huettig F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2193-220. PubMed ID: 22934784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.
    Vitevitch MS
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 17533890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonological neighbourhood effects in French spoken-word recognition.
    Dufour S; Frauenfelder UH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):226-38. PubMed ID: 19806483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of no-release variants in connected speech.
    LoCasto PC; Connine CM
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):181-97. PubMed ID: 21848079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature parsing: feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition.
    Gow DW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):575-90. PubMed ID: 12812280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of lexical factors on word recognition among normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayana S; Moshfegh A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 11392435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: lexical stress drives eye movements immediately.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):772-83. PubMed ID: 19691004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.
    Jesse A; Poellmann K; Kong YY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 28056135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition.
    Slowiaczek LM; Hamburger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Nov; 18(6):1239-50. PubMed ID: 1447549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological Priming in Children with Hearing Loss: Effect of Speech Mode, Fidelity, and Lexical Status.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Damian MF; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):623-633. PubMed ID: 27438867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?
    Newman RS; Sawusch JR; Luce PA
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):941-60. PubMed ID: 16496717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.
    Luce PA; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 9504270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word-form familiarity bootstraps infant speech segmentation.
    Altvater-Mackensen N; Mani N
    Dev Sci; 2013 Nov; 16(6):980-90. PubMed ID: 24118722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probabilistic Phonotactics as a Cue for Recognizing Spoken Cantonese Words in Speech.
    Yip MC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):201-210. PubMed ID: 27090111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.