329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15876215)
21. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper.
Leo P; Eijsackers HJ; Koelmans AA; Vijver MG
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 18757078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recent developments in the application of risk analysis to waste technologies.
Pollard SJ; Smith R; Longhurst PJ; Eduljee GH; Hall D
Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):1010-20. PubMed ID: 16860388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Collaboration and importance of federally sponsored Superfund research programs.
Spengler RF; Anderson BE; Zenick H
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 205(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 12018001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Balancing environmental and industry sustainability: a case study of the US gold mining industry.
Finnie B; Stuart J; Gibson L; Zabriskie F
J Environ Manage; 2009 Sep; 90(12):3690-9. PubMed ID: 19501452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modeling exposure to persistent chemicals in hazard and risk assessment.
Cowan-Ellsberry CE; McLachlan MS; Arnot JA; Macleod M; McKone TE; Wania F
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):662-79. PubMed ID: 19552503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Translating science into policy: using ecosystem thresholds to protect resources in Rocky Mountain National Park.
Porter E; Johnson S
Environ Pollut; 2007 Oct; 149(3):268-80. PubMed ID: 17693003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Toward a holistic and risk-based management of European river basins.
Brack W; Apitz SE; Borchardt D; Brils J; Cardoso AC; Foekema EM; van Gils J; Jansen S; Harris B; Hein M; Heise S; Hellsten S; de Maagd PG; Müller D; Panov VE; Posthuma L; Quevauviller P; Verdonschot PF; von der Ohe PC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 19132820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hazardous-waste sites: priority health conditions and research strategies--United States.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1992 Feb; 41(5):72-4. PubMed ID: 1732713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A novel system for environmental monitoring through a cooperative/synergistic scheme between bioindicators and biosensors.
Batzias F; Siontorou CG
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):221-39. PubMed ID: 16569474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reforming state-level chemicals management policies in the United States: status, challenges, and opportunities.
Geiser K; Tickner J; Torrie Y
New Solut; 2009; 19(1):9-29. PubMed ID: 19447756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation.
Wenning RJ; Sorensen M; Magar VS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16640319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A multilayered box model for calculating preliminary remediation goals in soil screening.
Shan C; Javandel I
Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 15876208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Environmental analysis in the selection of alternative corridors in a long-distance linear project: a methodological proposal.
Rescia AJ; Astrada EN; Bono J; Blasco CA; Meli P; Adámoli JM
J Environ Manage; 2006 Aug; 80(3):266-78. PubMed ID: 16490298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Environment. Avoiding destructive remediation at DOE sites.
Whicker FW; Hinton TG; MacDonell MM; Pinder JE; Habegger LJ
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1615-6. PubMed ID: 15016982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of site profiles for dose reconstruction used in worker compensation claims.
Kenoyer JL; Scalsky ED; Taulbee TD
Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18545029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk perception, future land use and stewardship: comparison of attitudes about Hanford Site and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
Burger J; Sanchez J; Roush D; Gochfeld M
J Environ Manage; 2001 Apr; 61(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 11383101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
