132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1587654)
1. The individualizing function of forensic multidisciplinary assessment in a Dutch residential setting: the Pieter Baan Centre experience.
Koenraadt F
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 1587654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Forensic psychiatry in The Netherlands: positioning and functioning of Dutch forensic psychiatrists.
Schnitzler JG
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):443-55. PubMed ID: 6679534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Center for forensic psychiatry evaluation unit services.
Jackson NL
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1996; (69):81-8. PubMed ID: 8935827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Who needs capacity?
Buchanan A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():1-5. PubMed ID: 25939285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychiatric justice.
Szasz T
Br J Psychiatry; 1989 Jun; 154():864-9. PubMed ID: 2597895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Szasz on psychiatric justice.
West DJ
Br J Psychiatry; 1989 Jun; 154():870-1. PubMed ID: 2597896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Racial differences in the criminalization of the mentally ill.
Grekin PM; Jemelka R; Trupin EW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 7841513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mentally abnormal killers in the UK health care system: issues facing the multidisciplinary team.
Hambridge JA
J Forensic Sci; 1995 Jan; 40(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 7876806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut.
Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives].
Nedopil N; Müller-Isberner R
Nervenarzt; 1995 Nov; 66(11):793-801. PubMed ID: 8532095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychiatric decision-making for the courts: judges, psychiatrists, lay people?
Jackson MW
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 9(4):507-20. PubMed ID: 3583530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cooperation between experts in fitness proceedings.
Oosthuizen H; Verschoor T
Med Law; 1992; 11(7-8):611-22. PubMed ID: 1302778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forensic psychiatry: critique of a critique.
Zonana HV
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 6478066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The limitations of the legal approach to mental health.
Jones K
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 7409954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend".
Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity.
McGrath JJ
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Residential mental health assessment within Dutch criminal cases: a discussion.
van der Leij JB; Jackson JL; Malsch M; Nijboer JF
Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(5-6):691-702. PubMed ID: 11787076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR].
Friemert K
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Reasonable medical certainty": can we meet Daubert standards in insanity cases?
Poythress NG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 15515909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Partial insanity: when the judiciary and the psychiatric world collide.
Altmark D; Sigal M; Gelkopf M
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 7558755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
