173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15876661)
1. An inter-laboratory comparison study of image quality of PET scanners using the NEMA NU 2-2001 procedure for assessment of image quality.
Bergmann H; Dobrozemsky G; Minear G; Nicoletti R; Samal M
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(10):2193-207. PubMed ID: 15876661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the NEMA NU 4 PET image quality phantom in multipinhole small-animal SPECT.
Harteveld AA; Meeuwis AP; Disselhorst JA; Slump CH; Oyen WJ; Boerman OC; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21849403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards the optimization of nuclear medicine procedures for better spatial resolution, sensitivity, scan image quality and quantitation measurements by using a new Monte Carlo model featuring PET imaging.
Karpetas GE; Michail CM; Fountos GP; Valsamaki PN; Kandarakis IS; Panayiotakis GS
Hell J Nucl Med; 2013; 16(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 23687642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability of lesion detectability and standardized uptake value according to the acquisition procedure and reconstruction among five PET scanners.
Takahashi Y; Oriuchi N; Otake H; Endo K; Murase K
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 18670864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method to measure PET scatter fractions for daily quality control.
de Jong HW; Lubberink M; Watabe H; Iida H; Lammertsma AA
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4609-15. PubMed ID: 19928092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems.
Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance evaluation of the PET sub-systems of two PET/CT imagers according to NEMA standard NU 2-2001.
Strigl M; Martínez MJ; Zach C; Ziegler SI; Hahn K
Z Med Phys; 2006; 16(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 16696374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards.
Miyake KK; Matsumoto K; Inoue M; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Oishi T; Kawase S; Kitamura K; Yamakawa Y; Akazawa A; Kobayashi T; Ohi J; Togashi K
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 55(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 24812244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiotracer dose reduction in integrated PET/MR: implications from national electrical manufacturers association phantom studies.
Oehmigen M; Ziegler S; Jakoby BW; Georgi JC; Paulus DH; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1361-7. PubMed ID: 25006216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cold wall effect eliminating method to determine the contrast recovery coefficient for small animal PET scanners using the NEMA NU-4 image quality phantom.
Lajtos I; Czernin J; Dahlbom M; Daver F; Emri M; Farshchi-Heydari S; Forgacs A; Hoh CK; Joszai I; Krizsan AK; Lantos J; Major P; Molnar J; Opposits G; Tron L; Vera DR; Balkay L
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(11):2727-46. PubMed ID: 24800813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. INVESTIGATION OF PARTIAL VOLUME EFFECT IN DIFFERENT PET/CT SYSTEMS: A COMPARISON OF RESULTS USING THE MADEIRA PHANTOM AND THE NEMA NU-2 2001 PHANTOM.
Chipiga L; Sydoff M; Zvonova I; Bernhardsson C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):365-70. PubMed ID: 26940437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes.
Kemp BJ; Kim C; Williams JJ; Ganin A; Lowe VJ;
J Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1960-7. PubMed ID: 17138738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters.
Westerterp M; Pruim J; Oyen W; Hoekstra O; Paans A; Visser E; van Lanschot J; Sloof G; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 17033848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using compressive sensing to recover images from PET scanners with partial detector rings.
Valiollahzadeh S; Clark JW; Mawlawi O
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 25563253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance Characteristics of the Whole-Body Discovery IQ PET/CT System.
Reynés-Llompart G; Gámez-Cenzano C; Romero-Zayas I; Rodríguez-Bel L; Vercher-Conejero JL; Martí-Climent JM
J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 28302761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes.
Mawlawi O; Podoloff DA; Kohlmyer S; Williams JJ; Stearns CW; Culp RF; Macapinlac H;
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1734-42. PubMed ID: 15471842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
