199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15876663)
21. Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography.
Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Bulling S; Schnyder P; Valley JF
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3156-64. PubMed ID: 14713082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Innovative monochromatic x-ray source for high-quality and low-dose medical imaging.
Silver EH; Shulman SD; Rehani MM
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1064-1078. PubMed ID: 33368354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computed tomography with monochromatic x rays.
Dilmanian FA
Am J Physiol Imaging; 1992; 7(3-4):175-93. PubMed ID: 1343214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimens.
Faulconer L; Parham C; Connor DM; Zhong Z; Kim E; Zeng D; Livasy C; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Pisano E
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1329-37. PubMed ID: 19596593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The design and application of an in-laboratory diffraction-enhanced x-ray imaging instrument.
Nesch I; Fogarty DP; Tzvetkov T; Reinhart B; Walus AC; Khelashvili G; Muehleman C; Chapman D
Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Sep; 80(9):093702. PubMed ID: 19791939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of a two-dimensional virtual-pixel X-ray imaging detector for time-resolved structure research.
Orthen A; Wagner H; Martoiu S; Amenitsch H; Bernstorff S; Besch HJ; Menk RH; Nurdan K; Rappolt M; Walenta AH; Werthenbach U
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2004 Mar; 11(Pt 2):177-86. PubMed ID: 14960783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. K-edge digital subtraction imaging with dichromatic x-ray sources: SNR and dose studies.
Sarnelli A; Elleaume H; Taibi A; Gambaccini M; Bravin A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4311-28. PubMed ID: 16912383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Front-illuminated versus back-illuminated photon-counting CCD-based gamma camera: important consequences for spatial resolution and energy resolution.
Heemskerk JW; Westra AH; Linotte PM; Ligtvoet KM; Zbijewski W; Beekman FJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):N149-62. PubMed ID: 17404450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Monochromatic beam characterization for Auger electron dosimetry and radiotherapy.
Dugas JP; Oves SD; Sajo E; Matthews KL; Ham K; Hogstrom KR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S137-41. PubMed ID: 18599232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Precise dose evaluation using a commercial phototransistor as a radiation detector.
Santos LA; Barros FR; Filho JA; da Silva EF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):60-3. PubMed ID: 16702243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative analysis of the effect of energy separation in k-edge digital subtraction imaging.
Sarnelli A; Taibi A; Baldelli P; Gambaccini M; Bravin A
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3015-26. PubMed ID: 17505086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High-energy x-ray microbeam with total-reflection mirror optics.
Suzuki Y; Takeuchi A; Terada Y
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 May; 78(5):053713. PubMed ID: 17552831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The maximum low-dose RBE of 17.4 and 40 keV monochromatic X rays for the induction of dicentric chromosomes in human peripheral lymphocytes.
Schmid E; Krumrey M; Ulm G; Roos H; Regulla D
Radiat Res; 2003 Nov; 160(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 14565834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combining flat crystals, bent crystals and compound refractive lenses for high-energy X-ray optics.
Shastri SD
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2004 Mar; 11(Pt 2):150-6. PubMed ID: 14960779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
