436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15877034)
1. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):542-51. PubMed ID: 15877034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of friction and flexural rigidity of the archwire on canine movement in sliding mechanics: a numerical simulation with a 3-dimensional finite element method.
Kojima Y; Fukui H; Miyajima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):275.e1-10. PubMed ID: 16979481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A numerical simulation of tooth movement by wire bending.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 17045144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Numerical simulations of canine retraction with T-loop springs based on the updated moment-to-force ratio.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 21135033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of transpalatal arch on molar movement produced by mesial force: a finite element simulation.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):335.e1-7; discussion 335-6. PubMed ID: 18774078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moment-to-force ratio, center of rotation, and force level: a finite element study predicting their interdependency for simulated orthodontic loading regimens.
Cattaneo PM; Dalstra M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):681-9. PubMed ID: 18456141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial stress differences between sliding and sectional mechanics with an endosseous implant as anchorage: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Vásquez M; Calao E; Becerra F; Ossa J; Enríquez C; Fresneda E
Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug; 71(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 11510633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics.
Tominaga JY; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Gonzales C; Kobayashi M; Yoshida N
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19852600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative evaluation of different compensating curves in the lingual and labial techniques using 3D FEM.
Sung SJ; Baik HS; Moon YS; Yu HS; Cho YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 12695772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Tominaga JY; Ozaki H; Chiang PC; Sumi M; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Bourauel C; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 25085299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stresses induced by edgewise appliances in the periodontal ligament--a finite element study.
McGuinness N; Wilson AN; Jones M; Middleton J; Robertson NR
Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 1554158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yang C; Wang C; Deng F; Fan Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A numerical simulation of tooth movement produced by molar uprighting spring.
Kojima Y; Mizuno T; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 18005837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical environment change in root, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone in response to two canine retraction treatment strategies.
Jiang F; Xia Z; Li S; Eckert G; Chen J
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Apr; 18 Suppl 1(0 1):29-38. PubMed ID: 25865531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulation of orthodontic tooth movements. A comparison of numerical models.
Bourauel C; Freudenreich D; Vollmer D; Kobe D; Drescher D; Jäger A
J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(2):136-51. PubMed ID: 10220981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Friction does not increase anchorage loading.
Southard TE; Marshall SD; Grosland NM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):412-4. PubMed ID: 17346599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system.
Rhee JN; Chun YS; Row J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 11244423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
