140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15877751)
1. Oxidized titanium implants (Nobel Biocare TiUnite) compared with turned titanium implants (Nobel Biocare mark III) with respect to implant failure in a group of consecutive patients treated with early functional loading and two-stage protocol.
Jungner M; Lundqvist P; Lundgren S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Jun; 16(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 15877751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate loading of Brånemark System Implants: a comparison between TiUnite and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible.
Fröberg KK; Lindh C; Ericsson I
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 17100744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series.
Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Petersson U; Wigren S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17100748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediately loaded titanium implants with a porous anodized surface with at least 36 months of follow-up.
Degidi M; Perrotti V; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):169-77. PubMed ID: 17100742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone.
Ivanoff CJ; Widmark G; Johansson C; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 12814308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective comparison of oxidized and turned implants with respect to implant survival, marginal bone level and peri-implant soft tissue conditions after at least 5 years in function.
Jungner M; Lundqvist P; Lundgren S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 22727027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Report of a case receiving full-arch rehabilitation in both jaws using immediate implant loading protocols: a 1-year resonance frequency analysis follow-up.
Portmann M; Glauser R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 16681490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo.
Al-Nawas B; Hangen U; Duschner H; Krummenauer F; Wagner W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 17535330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function.
Lekholm U; Gröndahl K; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):178-86. PubMed ID: 17100743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moderately roughened- and roughened-surface implants used as rigid orthodontic anchorage: a case series.
Kato S; Kato M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 16774594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Schmid B; Belser UC; Lussi A; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):631-8. PubMed ID: 16307568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early complete failures of fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: a 3-year analysis of 17 consecutive cluster failure patients.
Jemt T; Häger P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 16774593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of implant surface characteristics in the replacement of failed implants.
Alsaadi G; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 16634498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A retrospective analysis of 44 implants with no rotational primary stability used for fixed prosthesis anchorage.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):467-71. PubMed ID: 17622014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
