These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15878032)

  • 1. Dichloroaniline retention by nanofiltration membranes.
    Causserand C; Aimar P; Cravedi JP; Singlande E
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1594-600. PubMed ID: 15878032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nanofiltration processes applied to the removal of phenyl-ureas in natural waters.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; García C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun; 165(1-3):714-23. PubMed ID: 19054613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polyamide nanofiltration membranes to remove aniline in aqueous solutions.
    Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Bernal MD; Ortega S
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(9-12):1175-81. PubMed ID: 24701913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of transmembrane pressure and feed concentration on the retention of arsenic, chromium and cadmium from water by nanofiltration.
    Babaee Y; Mousavi SM; Danesh S; Baratian A
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2010 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21114097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes.
    Benitez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; Garcia C
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 18947854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharmaceutical rejection by membranes for wastewater reclamation and reuse.
    Park GY; Lee JH; Kim IS; Cho J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 15344797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions.
    De Munari A; Semiao AJ; Antizar-Ladislao B
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3484-96. PubMed ID: 23615337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency of nanofiltration for the elimination of steroids from water.
    Weber S; Gallenkemper M; Melin T; Dott W; Hollender J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):9-14. PubMed ID: 15497823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of cyanobacterial metabolites by nanofiltration from two treated waters.
    Dixon MB; Falconet C; Ho L; Chow CW; O'Neill BK; Newcombe G
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Apr; 188(1-3):288-95. PubMed ID: 21339048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimethoate and atrazine retention from aqueous solution by nanofiltration membranes.
    Ahmad AL; Tan LS; Shukor SR
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Feb; 151(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 17587496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arsenate removal using a combination treatment of precipitation and nanofiltration.
    Chang FF; Liu WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 22233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurotoxic and hepatotoxic cyanotoxins removal by nanofiltration.
    Teixeira MR; Rosa MJ
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(15):2837-46. PubMed ID: 16839584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adsorption of herbicides on coal fly ash from aqueous solutions.
    Singh N
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Aug; 168(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 19269091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes.
    Uyak V; Koyuncu I; Oktem I; Cakmakci M; Toroz I
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):789-94. PubMed ID: 17768007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adsorption of chloridazon from aqueous solution on heat and acid treated sepiolites.
    González-Pradas E; Socías-Viciana M; Ureña-Amate MD; Cantos-Molina A; Villafranca-Sánchez M
    Water Res; 2005 May; 39(9):1849-57. PubMed ID: 15899283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal of small trihalomethane precursors from aqueous solution by nanofiltration.
    Lin YL; Chiang PC; Chang EE
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):20-9. PubMed ID: 17212977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
    Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of sorption on the rejection of trace organic contaminants during nanofiltration.
    Steinle-Darling E; Litwiller E; Reinhard M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2592-8. PubMed ID: 20218539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.