607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15878065)
1. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold.
Midena E; Radin PP; Convento E; Cavarzeran F
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17294384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of cupola-free perimetry with conventional perimetry: preliminary results.
Jenni A; Hirsbrunner HP
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1990; 34(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 2079773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
Vonthein R; Rauscher S; Paetzold J; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Hermann A; Sadowski B; Chaumette C; Wild JM; Schiefer U
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17331580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The psychometric function and reaction times of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma.
Wall M; Maw RJ; Stanek KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):878-85. PubMed ID: 8603872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between Humphrey Field Analyzer and Micro Perimeter 1 in normal and glaucoma subjects.
Ratra V; Ratra D; Gupta M; Vaitheeswaran K
Oman J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 5(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22993464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients.
Yoshitomi T; Matsui T; Tanakadate A; Ishikawa S
J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [White-on-white, blue-on-yellow and blue-on-blue perimetry in normal subjects].
Ayala-Barroso E; Sánchez Méndez M; González Hernández M; González de la Rosa MA
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Nov; 78(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 14648367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
Meyer JH; Funk J
Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Kook MS; Yang SJ; Kim S; Chung J; Kim ST; Tchah H
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry.
Kutzko KE; Brito CF; Wall M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):2006-13. PubMed ID: 10845628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
